PAKET UMROH BULAN FEBRUARI MARET APRIL MEI 2017

TRAVEL UMROH RESMI KEMENAG RI

Daftar Segera Melalui Kami & Dapatkan VOUCHER GRATIS Souvenir Umroh SENILAI 1 JT
Call / WA: 0821-1420-2323 / Klik disini

 
Lihat Biaya Umroh 2018 Lihat Paket Umroh Desember 2017




Artikel lainnya »

sparepart AC yang telah pernah mengalami kebocoran di pipa pipa biasanya akan dapat menyebabkan pengendapan oli yang ada pada kompresor yang naik ke atas melalu jalur pipa pada indoor Sparepart AC, endapan oil inilah yang dapat menyebabkan sirkulasi pada freon menjadi tidak stabil dan tersendat, walau masalah kebocoran sudah dapat teratasi namun suhu ruangan tidak akan bisa mencapai suhu 20 derajat celcius. Bagaimana cara untuk dapat mengembalikan kondisi Sparepart AC seperti semula?? Dengan cara Flushing, berikut adalah gejala yang terjadi pada AC tersumbat :

    Ukur dengan Manifold gauge, jarum biasanya tidak stabil (tidak menentu)
    Suara terdengar lebih berisik daripada biasanya (suara seperti air yang mengalir) dan pada indoor bila terdapat gejala tersebut segera hubungi Service Sparepart AC, jika dibiarkan begitu saja akan dapat merusak kompresor.

Apa itu Flushing? (mengatasi AC mampet dengan cara membersihkan AC dan jalur pipa yang terhubung pada Indoor)

Cara Flushing AC :
Dengan cara memasang Manifold, Selang Kuning pada pipa yang akan di flushing lalu hubungkan dengan selang berwarna biru pada tabung freon. Gunakan freon R11 untunk mengangkat oli atau kotoran yang mengendap pada jalur pipa, pasang selang merah pada tabung freon R22, buka tabung R11 dan Kran (terbuka penuh) agar R11 dapat mengalir kedalam pipa tersebut, setelah R11 masuk kedalam pipa, kemudian tutup kembali keran dan tabung R11, lanjutkan dengan membuka tabung freon R22 dan keran selang merah untuk mendorong R11, tutup dengan tangan pada pipa besar tekan dengan sangat kuat sampai bertekanan tinggi kemudian lepas dan tutup kembali, oli akan larut dengan R11 (lakukan berulang kali hingga tidak ada sisa freon di R11).Lakukan cara tersebut hingga oli benar benar tidak ada lagi pada jalur pipa.

Flushing Outdoor dengan R11 :
Potong pipa highpress dan lowpress yang terhubung ke kompresor Sparepart AC (demi menghindari R11 untuk masuk kedalam kompresor) kemudian lakukan flushing dengan cara diatas, jangan lupa mengganti Sparepart AC filter dan pipa kapiler dengan yang baru. Setelah AC di flushing Outdoor dan Indoor, pipa yang terhubung diantara keduanya di pasang kembali pada AC sebelum di isi dengan freon. Lakukan vakum pada kompresor agar udara tidak terjebak didalamnya dan akan dapat menyebabkan AC tidak dingin walau sudah di flushing.

CARA MENGATASI AC SPLIT

saco-indonesia.com, Polresta Tangerang masih harus melakukan penyelidikan dalam kasus perampokan Bank BRI cabang Panongan yang dikaitkan dengan penemuan bom yang tak jauh dari lokasi perampokan.

“Kami juga masih harus memeriksa saksi pegawai BRI dan pemilik warteg,”jelas Kapolresta Tangerang Kombes Irfing Jaya,SIK,Kamis(26/12).

Dugaan kuat pelaku perampokan pemilik bom yang meninggalkan tasnya di warteg yang tak jauh dari BRI cabang Kecamatan Panongan.

Dugaan ini telah diperkuat dari keterangan saksi pemilik warteg Kuseri dan Ayu. Menurut kedua saksi peristiwa perampokan tersebut, warungnya telah didatangi 6 pria berboncengan naik tiga motor sekitar pk.14.30 pada Selasa (24/12).

Enam lelaki yang naik motor antara lain Honda Beat putih itu makan dan minum sekitar setengah jam..”Mereka meninggalkan warteg setelah membayar makanan,”ucap Kuseri. Sekitar 30 menit kemudian. terjadi aksi perampokan di BRI.

Kuseri saat membersihkan lantai warung telah menemukan tas gendong hitam di bawah meja makan. Ia mengira tas itu milik pelanggan warteg yang tertinggal. sehingga sempat disimpan di kamarnya.

Karena sampai malem tas itu gak ada yang mengambil ia curiga lalu bersama rekannya mencoba untuk membuka tas tersebut. Ternyata tas itu berisi balutan lakban, baterai merah dan kabel. Ia curiga sebagai bom sehingga dilaporkan ke Polsek Panongan dan diteruskan ke Polresta Tangerang.

Kapolresta Tangerang Kombes Irfing yang telah memeriksa isi tas itu memastikan sebagai bahan peledak sehingga telah meminta bantuan tim Gegana Polda Metro Jaya untuk dapat mengevakuasi tas hitam tersebut akhir diledakan di tanah lapang.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

POLRESTA MASIH SELIDIKI KASUS RAMPOK BANK

Harga Bahan Bangunan 2013

Harga Bahan Bangunan 2013, Harga : Pasir dan Batu, Semen, Besi, Kayu, Alat dan Kabel Listrik, Cat Dinding, Cat Besi dan Kayu, Genteng Metal, Penutup Atap, Granit, Keramik, Lampu, Papan Fiber Semen, Parket, Pipa PVC, Polikarbonat, Pelapis Anti Bocor/Waterproofing, Hebel, Beton readymix, Peralatan Kerja, Atap Baja Ringan, Upah Tukang, Harga Borongan Bangunan
HARGA BAHAN BANGUNAN 2013
Harga Upah Tukang/Pekerja Bangunan
Harga Borongan Pekerjaan Bangunan
Harga Pasir dan Batu
Harga Semen
Harga Besi
Harga Wiremesh
Harga Paku
Harga Kayu
Harga Keramik
Harga Granit
Harga Cat Dinding
Harga Cat Besi & Kayu
Harga Penutup Atap
Harga Asbes
Harga Seng
Harga Atap Baja Ringan
Harga Genteng Metal
Harga Gypsum & GRC
Harga Triplek
Harga Hebel
Harga Asbes
Harga Beton Readymix
Harga Pipa PVC
Harga Lampu
Harga Lampu LED
Harga Parket Kayu
Harga Parket Bambu
Harga Paving Block / Conblock
Harga Waterproofing
Harga Polikarbonat
Harga Papan Fiber Semen
Harga Alat Listrik
Harga Kabel Listrik
Harga Peralatan Kerja
Harga Kaca
Harga Kaca Tempered
Harga Kunci Gembok
Harga Wastafel
Harga Closet Jongkok
Harga Closet Duduk
LAIN - LAIN
GAMBAR DESAIN INTERIOR RUMAH
INFO KPR RUMAH
INFO HARGA SPRING BED
INFO HARGA MOBIL BARU
INFO HARGA MOBIL BEKAS/SECOND
INFO HARGA SEPEDA MOTOR BARU
INFO KECANTIKAN WANITA
INFO ANAK & BALITA
    
TEKNOLOGI BAHAN BANGUNAN
Glass Block Warna
Mengenal Steel Floor Deck
Wiremesh Untuk Penguat Bangunan
Sealant untuk Penambal, Perekat dan Pengisi
Mengenal Ukuran Pipa PVC dan Kegunaannya
Mengenal Papan Gypsum
Mengenal Jenis-Jenis Lampu
Mengenal Jenis Kabel Listrik
Papan Fiber Semen Alternatif Pengganti Gypsum
Keunggulan Material Gypsum
TEKNIK BANGUNAN
Cara Pasang Glass Block
Cara Memasang Angkur
Cara Menyambung Pipa Paralon/PVC
Cara Membuat Kran Air Otomatis
Cara Menguji Bata Merah Berkualitas
Menghitung Kebutuhan Cat Dinding/Tembok
Cara Merawat Water Heater
Cara Memasang Water Heater
Cara Menghitung Kebutuhan Paving/Conblock
Cara Pasang Conblock dan Constone
TIPS BANGUNAN
Tips Renovasi Lancar
Tips Memilih Batako
Tips Memilih Angkur
Tips Membeli Rumah Menurut Fengshui
Tips Memasang Wallpaper
Tips Memilih Lantai Granit
Tips Memilih Lampu Hias
Tips Memilih Kunci / Pegangan Pintu
Tips Memilih Papan Gypsum
Tips Memilih Polikarbonat
Tips Memilih Kayu
Tips Memilih Keramik Lantai
Tips Memilih Water Heater
Tips Membeli Wiremesh
Tips Memilih Cat Rumah/Tembok
Tips Memilih Pasir Untuk Bangunan
warna warni glass block

Glass Block yaitu bahan bangunan yang terbuat dari kaca tebal sehingga dapat ditembus cahaya. Bentuknya seperti bata, persegi empat dengan ukuran panjang 19 cm, lebar 19 cm, dan tebal 8 cm. Karena tembus cahaya, material ini sering dijadikan solusi untuk mengatasi di tempat yang gelap, misalnya saja di kamar mandi.

Dipasaran, glass block identik dengan warna bening atau biasa disebut juga dengan glass block warna putih. Tetapi, tahukah Anda ada produsen yang sudah mengeluarkan glass block dengan pilihan warna yang beragam? Adalah PT. Venus Ceramica International yang mengeluarkan material ini dalam tampilan yang lebih berwarna. Ada merah, jingga, kuning, hijau, biru, ungu, cokelat, abu-abu, dll. Jadi tinggal sesuaikan aja warnanya dengan selera Anda.

Yang menarik, kehadiran warna ini turut menaikkan citra dan fungsi glass block. Dulu Glass block identik dengan dinding kamar mandi. Sekarang dapat diaplikasikan di semua ruang di rumah seperti ruang keluarga, ruang makan, kamar tidur, bahkan lantai. Tak hanya memasukkan cahaya, material ini dapat dijadikan sebagai elemen dekoratif untuk mempercantik tampilan dinding. Harga Glass Block berkisar Rp. 54.900,- sampai dengan Rp. 94.900,- per buah.

(Sumber : Tabloid Rumah)

Baca Juga :
- Cara Pasang Glass Block
Diposkan oleh mucekilweb 2 komentar
Kirimkan Ini lewat EmailBlogThis!Berbagi ke TwitterBerbagi ke Facebook
Label: glass block, glass block warna, harga glass block, harga glass block 2013, harga glass block warna
Cara Pasang Glass Block
Cara Pasang Glass Block

Pemasangan glass block  mirip dengan pemasangan dinding batu bata. Anda harus menyusunnya dari bawah lalu ke atas. Agar pemasangan lurus, Anda dapat menggunakan benang. Hanya saja, glass block tidak dapat menggunakan campuran semen biasa, namun harus menggunakan semen instan yang memiliki zat additive. Tebalnya cukup 3 mm.

(Sumber : Tabloid Rumah)

Baca juga :
- Kini Hadir Glass Block Warna
Diposkan oleh mucekilweb 0 komentar
Kirimkan Ini lewat EmailBlogThis!Berbagi ke TwitterBerbagi ke Facebook
Label: cara pasang glass block, glass block, pasang glass block
Posting Lama Beranda
Langganan: Entri (Atom)
Search
Google
Custom Search
Daftar Suku Bunga KPR 2013
Bank    Rate KPR (Fix/Floating)
BNI    9,9 % (1 th) / 11,00 %
Mandiri    8,8% (1 th)/11,10 %
BCA    9,50% (floating)
BTN    7,49 % (2 th) /  11,08 %
BRI    7,5 % (2 th) / 10,25 %  
Permata    8,5% (1 th) / 11,50 %  
CIMB Niaga    9,25 % (1 th) / 11,00 %  
Danamon    9,75 % (1 th)/ 12,25 %
Panin    8,88 % (3 th) / 11,75 %  
OCBC NISP    Floating 12,50 %  
HSBC    Floating 8,75 %  
Bank Jabar Banten    Floating 9,14 %  
Bank Mega    Floating 12,50 %  
UOB Buana    10,75 % (1 th)
Bukopin    Floating 12,40 %  
BII    Floating 10,37 %
Bank ANZ Indonesia    7,99 % (2 th) / 10,68 %
ICB Bumi Putera    10,75 % (1 th)

Top 100 Real Estate Sites on Top100Add.com - Add your Site, Boost Your Traffic!
GAMBAR RUMAH MINIMALIS
▶     Type Kecil 1 Lt (> 150 m2)
▶     Type Kecil 2 Lt (> 150 m2)
▶     Type Sedang 2 Lt (150 - 300 m2)
Harga Perlengkapan Rumah
      


Harga Air Purifier
Harga AC
Harga LED TV
Harga Water Heater
Harga Pompa
Harga Springbed

INFO PERUMAHAN BARU DI BANDUNG
INFO BANK KPR RUMAH
    
Copyright 2012 - Mucekilweb. Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

 

WARNA WARNI GLASS BLOCK

saco-indonesia.com, Polisi akhirnya telah berhasil untuk mengungkap pelaku pembunuhan wanita dalam mobil Nissan March putih F 1356 KA. Satu dari dua pelaku, telah diamankan oleh jajaran Polres Jakarta Timur.

Berdasarkan informasi yang telah berhasil dihimpun, salah satu pelaku berhasil ditangkap, Sabtu (1/2) malam. Petugas tengah menggiring pelaku atas nama Daniel ke Pasar Kecapi, Pondok Gede, untuk dapat menggambil barang bukti motor yang digunakannya.

Daniel sendiri bukanlah pelaku utama atas tewasnya Feby Lorita. Ia hanya bertugas untuk membantu pelaku utama Ed, yang saat ini masih dalam proses pengejaran di Medan. Daniel sendiri juga merupakan seorang angkot yang terbujuk rayu Ed.

Kabar ditangkapnya Daniel sendiri, juga telah dibenarkan oleh Kapolres Jakarta Timur, Kombes Mulyadi Kaharni. Namun, ia belum dapat memberikan keterangan detil atas penangkapan yang dilakukan petugasnya. Melalui pesan singkatnya, Mulyadi hanya menulis. “Iya, sudah tahu kan,” tulisnya.

TIDAK HAMIL

Sementara itu, berdasarkan hasil otopsi yang telah dilakukan petugas, Feby sendiri tidak dalam kondisi hamil. Hanya saja, luka akibat benda tajam terlihat di leher korban. “Dari hasil otopsi korban sendiri tidak hamil,” kata Kasat Reskrim AKBP Didik Sugiarto.

Didik sendiri mengaku, jasad yang ditemukan di bagasi mobil disamping TPU Pondok Kelapa, Duren Sawit, benar Feby Lorita. Hal itu telah teruji dari hasil sidik jari korban yang dibandingkan dengan ijazah SMU miliknya. “Hasilnya identik 100 persen, korban adalah benar Feby Lorita,” tuturnya


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

PELAKU UTAMA PEMBUNUH FEBY LORITA DIBURU KE MEDAN

saco-indonesia.com, Empat anggota komplotan bandit spesialis pencuri di rumah kosong (rumsong) telah dibekuk oleh aparat Jatanras Polda Metro Jaya. Kawanan ini telah ditangkap sehari setelah beraksi di sebuah rumah mewah di kawasan Cilandak pada 13 Desember 2013 lalu.

Mereka yang telah dibekuk adalah S, Y, H dan T.  Korban yang bernama Laila Jafar juga sedang tidak berada di rumah. Dari sinilah modus mereka untuk dapat mencuri. ”Kalau ada orangnya bertanya dengan alasan cari alamat, kalau tidak ada langsung dibobol,” kata Kabid Humas Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Rikwanto.

Dalam pembobolan rumah Laila, empat pencuri ini telah mendapatkan uang tunai Rp25 juta, telepon genggam serta sejumlah perhiasan. Rikwanto telah mengatakan, polisi juga sudah mengendus tindakan mereka dan keempatnya langsung ditangkap di rumahnya masing-masing.”Jadi uang curian belum sempat dibagikan,” katanya.

Dikatakan Rikwanto juga menjelaskan, para pelaku pencurian rumah kosong ini juga tidak selalu mendapatkan hasil curiannya. Mereka juga tidak memiliki insting mengetahui apakah ada harta di dalam rumah tersebut.  Mereka cuma hanya bisa membobol rumah dan mengambil barang yang dinilai berharga. Dari perbuatan ini, keempatnya telah diancam dengan Pasal 363 KUHP dengan ancaman tujuh tahun penjara.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

KAWANAN SPESIALIS RUMSONG TELAH DIBEKUK OLEH POLISI

Ms. Plisetskaya, renowned for her fluidity of movement, expressive acting and willful personality, danced on the Bolshoi stage well into her 60s, but her life was shadowed by Stalinism.

Maya Plisetskaya, Ballerina Who Embodied Bolshoi, Dies at 89

Gagne wrestled professionally from the late 1940s until the 1980s and was a transitional figure between the early 20th century barnstormers and the steroidal sideshows of today

Verne Gagne, Wrestler Who Grappled Through Two Eras, Dies at 89

Mr. Pfaff was an international affairs columnist and author who found Washington’s intervention in world affairs often misguided.

William Pfaff, Critic of American Foreign Policy, Dies at 86

Imagine an elite professional services firm with a high-performing, workaholic culture. Everyone is expected to turn on a dime to serve a client, travel at a moment’s notice, and be available pretty much every evening and weekend. It can make for a grueling work life, but at the highest levels of accounting, law, investment banking and consulting firms, it is just the way things are.

Except for one dirty little secret: Some of the people ostensibly turning in those 80- or 90-hour workweeks, particularly men, may just be faking it.

Many of them were, at least, at one elite consulting firm studied by Erin Reid, a professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. It’s impossible to know if what she learned at that unidentified consulting firm applies across the world of work more broadly. But her research, published in the academic journal Organization Science, offers a way to understand how the professional world differs between men and women, and some of the ways a hard-charging culture that emphasizes long hours above all can make some companies worse off.

Photo
 
Credit Peter Arkle

Ms. Reid interviewed more than 100 people in the American offices of a global consulting firm and had access to performance reviews and internal human resources documents. At the firm there was a strong culture around long hours and responding to clients promptly.

“When the client needs me to be somewhere, I just have to be there,” said one of the consultants Ms. Reid interviewed. “And if you can’t be there, it’s probably because you’ve got another client meeting at the same time. You know it’s tough to say I can’t be there because my son had a Cub Scout meeting.”

Some people fully embraced this culture and put in the long hours, and they tended to be top performers. Others openly pushed back against it, insisting upon lighter and more flexible work hours, or less travel; they were punished in their performance reviews.

The third group is most interesting. Some 31 percent of the men and 11 percent of the women whose records Ms. Reid examined managed to achieve the benefits of a more moderate work schedule without explicitly asking for it.

They made an effort to line up clients who were local, reducing the need for travel. When they skipped work to spend time with their children or spouse, they didn’t call attention to it. One team on which several members had small children agreed among themselves to cover for one another so that everyone could have more flexible hours.

A male junior manager described working to have repeat consulting engagements with a company near enough to his home that he could take care of it with day trips. “I try to head out by 5, get home at 5:30, have dinner, play with my daughter,” he said, adding that he generally kept weekend work down to two hours of catching up on email.

Despite the limited hours, he said: “I know what clients are expecting. So I deliver above that.” He received a high performance review and a promotion.

What is fascinating about the firm Ms. Reid studied is that these people, who in her terminology were “passing” as workaholics, received performance reviews that were as strong as their hyper-ambitious colleagues. For people who were good at faking it, there was no real damage done by their lighter workloads.

It calls to mind the episode of “Seinfeld” in which George Costanza leaves his car in the parking lot at Yankee Stadium, where he works, and gets a promotion because his boss sees the car and thinks he is getting to work earlier and staying later than anyone else. (The strategy goes awry for him, and is not recommended for any aspiring partners in a consulting firm.)

A second finding is that women, particularly those with young children, were much more likely to request greater flexibility through more formal means, such as returning from maternity leave with an explicitly reduced schedule. Men who requested a paternity leave seemed to be punished come review time, and so may have felt more need to take time to spend with their families through those unofficial methods.

The result of this is easy to see: Those specifically requesting a lighter workload, who were disproportionately women, suffered in their performance reviews; those who took a lighter workload more discreetly didn’t suffer. The maxim of “ask forgiveness, not permission” seemed to apply.

It would be dangerous to extrapolate too much from a study at one firm, but Ms. Reid said in an interview that since publishing a summary of her research in Harvard Business Review she has heard from people in a variety of industries describing the same dynamic.

High-octane professional service firms are that way for a reason, and no one would doubt that insane hours and lots of travel can be necessary if you’re a lawyer on the verge of a big trial, an accountant right before tax day or an investment banker advising on a huge merger.

But the fact that the consultants who quietly lightened their workload did just as well in their performance reviews as those who were truly working 80 or more hours a week suggests that in normal times, heavy workloads may be more about signaling devotion to a firm than really being more productive. The person working 80 hours isn’t necessarily serving clients any better than the person working 50.

In other words, maybe the real problem isn’t men faking greater devotion to their jobs. Maybe it’s that too many companies reward the wrong things, favoring the illusion of extraordinary effort over actual productivity.

How Some Men Fake an 80-Hour Workweek, and Why It Matters

Ms. Rendell was a prolific writer of intricately plotted mystery novels that combined psychological insight, social conscience and teeth-chattering terror.

Ruth Rendell, Novelist Who Thrilled and Educated, Dies at 85

The 6-foot-10 Phillips played alongside the 6-11 Rick Robey on the Wildcats team that won the 1978 N.C.A.A. men’s basketball title.

Mike Phillips, Half of Kentucky’s ‘Twin Towers’ of Basketball, Dies at 59

The bottle Mr. Sokolin famously broke was a 1787 Château Margaux, which was said to have belonged to Thomas Jefferson. Mr. Sokolin had been hoping to sell it for $519,750.

William Sokolin, Wine Seller Who Broke Famed Bottle, Dies at 85

Ms. von Furstenberg made her debut in the movies and on the Broadway stage in the early 1950s as a teenager and later reinvented herself as a television actress, writer and philanthropist.

Betsy von Furstenberg, Baroness and Versatile Actress, Dies at 83

WASHINGTON — A decade after emergency trailers meant to shelter Hurricane Katrina victims instead caused burning eyes, sore throats and other more serious ailments, the Environmental Protection Agency is on the verge of regulating the culprit: formaldehyde, a chemical that can be found in commonplace things like clothes and furniture.

But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.

The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.

Continue reading the main story
 

Document: The Formaldehyde Fight

Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.

The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.

“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”

The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.

What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.

Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.

“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.

Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.

Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.

Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”

Continue reading the main story

Formaldehyde in Laminate Flooring

In laminate flooring, formaldehyde is used as a bonding agent in the fiberboard (or other composite wood) core layer and may also be used in glues that bind layers together. Concerns were raised in March when certain laminate flooring imported from China was reported to contain levels of formaldehyde far exceeding the limit permitted by California.

Typical

laminate

flooring

CLEAR FINISH LAYER

Often made of melamine resin

PATTERN LAYER

Paper printed to resemble wood,

or a thin wood veneer

GLUE

Layers may be bound using

formaldehyde-based glues

CORE LAYER

Fiberboard or other

composite, formed using

formaldehyde-based adhesives

BASE LAYER

Moisture-resistant vapor barrier

What is formaldehyde?

Formaldehyde is a common chemical used in many industrial and household products as an adhesive, bonding agent or preservative. It is classified as a volatile organic compound. The term volatile means that, at room temperature, formaldehyde will vaporize, or become a gas. Products made with formaldehyde tend to release this gas into the air. If breathed in large quantities, it may cause health problems.

WHERE IT IS COMMONLY FOUND

POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS

Pressed-wood and composite wood products

Wallpaper and paints

Spray foam insulation used in construction

Commercial wood floor finishes

Crease-resistant fabrics

In cigarette smoke, or in the fumes from combustion of other materials, including wood, oil and gasoline.

Exposure to formaldehyde in sufficient amounts may cause eye, throat or skin irritation, allergic reactions, and respiratory problems like coughing, wheezing or asthma.

Long-term exposure to high levels has been associated with cancer in humans and laboratory animals.

Exposure to formaldehyde may affect some people more severely than others.

By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.

Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.

White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.

The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.

As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.

“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”

Senator Vitter’s staff was pleased.

“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.

Advertisement

The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)

But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.

Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.

“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”

Photo
 
Becky Gillette wants strong regulation of formaldehyde. Credit Beth Hall for The New York Times

Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.

Within a matter of weeks, two letters — using nearly identical language — were sent by House and Senate lawmakers to the E.P.A. — with the industry group forwarding copies of the letters to the agency as well, and then posting them on its website.

The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.

The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”

Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.

Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”

Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.

While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.

An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.

“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”

An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.

“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.

But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.

“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”

The Uphill Battle to Better Regulate Formaldehyde

Public perceptions of race relations in America have grown substantially more negative in the aftermath of the death of a young black man who was injured while in police custody in Baltimore and the subsequent unrest, far eclipsing the sentiment recorded in the wake of turmoil in Ferguson, Mo., last summer.

Americans are also increasingly likely to say that the police are more apt to use deadly force against a black person, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

The poll findings highlight the challenges for local leaders and police officials in trying to maintain order while sustaining faith in the criminal justice system in a racially polarized nation.

Sixty-one percent of Americans now say race relations in this country are generally bad. That figure is up sharply from 44 percent after the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown and the unrest that followed in Ferguson in August, and 43 percent in December. In a CBS News poll just two months ago, 38 percent said race relations were generally bad. Current views are by far the worst of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The negative sentiment is echoed by broad majorities of blacks and whites alike, a stark change from earlier this year, when 58 percent of blacks thought race relations were bad, but just 35 percent of whites agreed. In August, 48 percent of blacks and 41 percent of whites said they felt that way.

Looking ahead, 44 percent of Americans think race relations are worsening, up from 36 percent in December. Forty-one percent of blacks and 46 percent of whites think so. Pessimism among whites has increased 10 points since December.

Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?
60
40
20
0
White
Black
May '14
May '15
Generally bad
Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are getting better, getting worse or staying about the same?
Getting worse
Staying the same
Getting better
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37
17
46
36
16
41
42
15

The poll finds that profound racial divisions in views of how the police use deadly force remain. Blacks are more than twice as likely to say police in most communities are more apt to use deadly force against a black person — 79 percent of blacks say so compared with 37 percent of whites. A slim majority of whites say race is not a factor in a police officer’s decision to use deadly force.

Overall, 44 percent of Americans say deadly force is more likely to be used against a black person, up from 37 percent in August and 40 percent in December.

Blacks also remain far more likely than whites to say they feel mostly anxious about the police in their community. Forty-two percent say so, while 51 percent feel mostly safe. Among whites, 8 in 10 feel mostly safe.

One proposal to address the matter — having on-duty police officers wear body cameras — receives overwhelming support. More than 9 in 10 whites and blacks alike favor it.

Continue reading the main story
How would you describe your feelings about the police in your community? Would you say they make you feel mostly safe or mostly anxious?
Mostly safe
Mostly anxious
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
75%
21
3
81
16
3
51
42
7
Continue reading the main story
In general, do you think the police in most communities are more likely to use deadly force against a black person, or more likely to use it against a white person, or don’t you think race affects police use of deadly force?
Police more likely to use deadly force against a black person
Police more likely to use deadly force against a white person
Race DOES NOT affect police use of deadly force
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37%
79%
2%
2%
1%
46%
53%
16%
9%
8%
4%
Continue reading the main story
Do you favor or oppose on-duty police officers wearing video cameras that would record events and actions as they occur?
Favor
Oppose
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
92%
93%
93%
6%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%

Asked specifically about the situation in Baltimore, most Americans expressed at least some confidence that the investigation by local authorities would be conducted fairly. But while nearly two-thirds of whites think so, fewer than half of blacks agree. Still, more blacks are confident now than were in August regarding the investigation in Ferguson. On Friday, six members of the police force involved in the arrest of Mr. Gray were charged with serious offenses, including manslaughter. The poll was conducted Thursday through Sunday; results from before charges were announced are similar to those from after.

Reaction to the recent turmoil in Baltimore, however, is similar among blacks and whites. Most Americans, 61 percent, say the unrest after Mr. Gray’s death was not justified. That includes 64 percent of whites and 57 percent of blacks.

Continue reading the main story
As you may know, a Baltimore man, Freddie Gray, recently died after being in the custody of the Baltimore police. How much confidence do you have that the investigation by local authorities into this matter will be conducted fairly?
A lot
Some
Not much
None at all
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
29%
31
22
14
5
31
33
20
11
5
20
26
30
22
In general, do you think the unrest in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray was justified, or do you think the unrest was not justified?
Justified
Not justified
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
28%
61
11
26
64
11
37
57
6

Negative View of U.S. Race Relations Grows, Poll Finds

ate in February, Dr. Ben Carson, the celebrated pediatric neurosurgeon turned political insurrectionist, was trying to check off another box on his presidential-campaign to-do list: hiring a press secretary. The lead prospect, a public-relations specialist named Deana Bass, had come to meet him at the dimly lit Capitol Hill office of Carson’s confidant and business manager, Armstrong Williams. Carson sat back and scrutinized her from behind a small granite table, as life-size cardboard cutouts of more conventional politicians — President Obama, with a tight smile, and Senator John McCain, glowering — loomed behind each of his shoulders. (The mock $3 bill someone had left on a table in Williams’s waiting room undercut any notion that this was a bipartisan zone; it featured Obama wearing a turban.)

Bass seemed momentarily speechless, and not just because no one had warned her that a New York Times reporter would be sitting in on her job interview. Though she knew Williams — a jack-of-all-trades entrepreneur who owns several television stations and a public-affairs business and who hosts a daily talk-radio show — through Washington’s small circle of black conservatives, the two hadn’t spoken in years until he called her two days earlier. He had been struggling to come up with the perfect national spokesperson, he told her. Then, at the gym, her name popped into his head; Williams was fairly certain she was the one. Sitting across from a likely candidate for president, Bass was adjusting to the idea that her life might be about to take a sudden chaotic turn.

“It’s like getting the most random call on a Monday that you simply do not see coming,” she said. “Oftentimes, that is how the Lord works.”

Continue reading the main story

His life in brain surgery
has prepared him for the
presidency, he maintains,
better than lives in
politics have for his rivals.

Carson concurred: “It’s always how he works in my life.” Carson is soft-spoken and often talks with his eyes half closed, frequently punctuating his sentences with a small laugh, even if the humor of his statement is not readily apparent. Bass told Carson that she had been a Republican staff member on Capitol Hill then worked for the Republican National Committee. In 2007 she started a Christian public-relations firm with her sister. She enjoyed working on the Hill, she said, but the pay wasn’t as high as the hours were long. “We figured that we worked like slaves for other people, and we wanted to work for ourselves.”

Carson stopped her. “You know you can’t mention that word, right?” Carson waited a beat, then laughed, and Williams and Bass joined in. He was getting to the point; he needed a professional who could help him check his penchant for creating uncontrolled controversy just by talking.

The Ben Carson movement began in 2013, when Carson, a neurosurgeon, whose operating-room prowess and up-from-poverty back story had made him the subject of a television movie and a regular on the inspirational-speaking circuit, was invited to address the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington. With Barack Obama sitting just two seats away, Carson warned that “moral decay” and “fiscal irresponsibility” could destroy America just as it did ancient Rome. He proposed a substitute for Obamacare — Health Savings Accounts, which, he said, would end any talk of “death panels” — and a flat-tax based on the concept of tithing. His address, combined with the president’s stony reaction, was a smash with Republican activists. Speaking and interview requests flooded in. Carson, then 61, announced his planned retirement a few weeks later, freeing his calendar to accept just about all of them. In the months that followed, his rhetoric became increasingly strident. The claim that drew the most attention, perhaps, was that Obamacare was “the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.”

Bass’s own use of the word prompted Carson to ask her what she thought about that incident. She considered for a moment.

“If you want to reach people and have them even understand what you’re saying, there is a way to do it, without that hyperbole, that might be. . . . ” She paused. “I just think it’s important not to shut people off before they —”

Carson jumped in. “That doesn’t allow them to hear what you’re saying?”

Bass nodded.

Likening Obamacare to slavery — and slavery was incomparably worse, Carson said — had its political advantages for a candidacy like his. It was the kind of statement that stoked the angriest of the Republican voters: conservative stalwarts who can’t hear enough bad things about Obama. This, in turn, led to more talk-radio and Fox News appearances, more book sales, more donations to the super PAC started in his name, more support in the polls. (The day before the meeting, one poll of Republican voters showed Carson statistically tied for first place with Jeb Bush and Scott Walker.)

Rhetorical excess was good for business, but Carson now wants to be seen as more than a novelty candidate. He has come to learn that such extreme analogies, while true to his views, aren’t especially presidential. They alienate more moderate voters and, perhaps even more damaging, reinforce the impression that he is not “serious” — that he is another Herman Cain, the black former Godfather’s Pizza chief executive who rose to the top of the early presidential polls in 2011 but then bowed out before the Iowa caucuses, largely because of leaked allegations of sexual misconduct, which he denied but from which he never recovered. Cain lingers as a cautionary tale for the party as much as for a right-leaning candidate like Carson. The fact that Cain, with his folksy sayings (“shucky ducky”) and misnomers (“Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan”), reached the top of the national polls — much less that he was eventually followed there by the likes of Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, who all topped one or another poll in the 2012 primary season — wound up being a considerable embarrassment for the eventual nominee, Mitt Romney, and for the longtime party regulars who were trying to fast-track his way to the nomination.

Carson liked Bass and, without directly saying so, made it clear the job was hers for the taking. Carson’s campaign chairman, Terry Giles — a white lawyer whose clients have included the comedian Richard Pryor and the stepson of the model Anna Nicole Smith and who helped reconcile the business interests of the descendants of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. — had assembled a mostly white campaign team, including many from the 2012 Gingrich effort, and Carson wanted a person of color to speak for him. Bass said she would have to mull it over, pray about it. Carson nodded approvingly. “Pray about it,” he said. “See what you think.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Williams knew the party was intent on protecting the eventual 2016 nominee from the same embarrassment Romney suffered. Already, suspiciously tough articles about Carson were showing up in conservative magazines and on right-wing websites. “They’re protecting these establishment candidates,” Williams said. “This is coming from within the house. This is family.” At the very least, he wanted to make sure that Carson didn’t do their work for them. (Carson would commit another unforced error a week later, when he told CNN that homosexuality was clearly a choice, because a lot of people go in prison straight and “when they come out, they’re gay”; he later apologized.)

“We need somebody to protect him, sometimes, from himself,” he told Bass — laughing, but only half kidding.

A candidacy like Carson’s presents a new kind of problem to the establishment wing of the G.O.P., which, at least since 1980, has selected its presidential nominees with a routine efficiency that Democrats could only envy. The establishment candidate has usually been a current or former governor or senator, blandly Protestant, hailing from the moderate, big-business wing of the party (or at least friendly with it) and almost always a second-, third- or fourth-time national contender — someone who had waited “his turn.” These candidates would tack predictably to the right during the primaries to satisfy the evangelicals, deficit hawks, libertarian leaners and other inconvenient but vital constituents who made up the “base” of the party. In return, the base would, after a brief flirtation with some fantasy candidate like Steve Forbes or Pat Buchanan, “hold their noses” and deliver their votes come November. This bargain was always tenuous, of course, and when some of the furthest-right activists turned against George W. Bush, citing (among other apostasies) his expansion of Medicare’s prescription drug benefit, it began to fall apart. After Barack Obama defeated McCain in 2008, the party’s once dependable base started to reconsider the wisdom of holding their noses at all.

Photo
 
Republican candidates at a pre-straw-poll debate, held at Iowa State University in 2011. Credit Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

This insurgent attitude was helped along by changes in the nomination rules. In 2010, the Republican National Committee, hoping to capture the excitement of the coast-to-coast Democratic primary competition between Obama and Hillary Clinton, introduced new voting rules that required many of the early voting states to award some delegates to losing candidates, based on their shares of the vote. The proportional voting rules would encourage struggling candidates to stay in the primaries even after successive losses, as Clinton did, because they might be able to pull together enough delegates to take the nomination in a convention-floor fight or at least use them to bargain for a prime speaking slot or cabinet post.

This shift in incentives did not go unnoticed by potential 2012 candidates, nor did changes in election law that allowed billionaire donors to form super PACs in support of pet candidacies. At the same time, increasingly widespread broadband Internet access allowed candidates to reach supporters directly with video and email appeals and supporters to send money with the tap of a smartphone, making it easier than ever for individual candidates to ignore the wishes of the party.

Into this newly chaotic Republican landscape strode Mitt Romney. There could be no doubt that it was his turn, and yet his journey to the nomination was interrupted by one against-the-odds challenger after another — Cain, Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul; always Ron Paul. It was easy to dismiss the 2012 primaries as a meaningless circus, but the onslaught did much more than tarnish the overall Republican brand. It also forced Romney to spend money he could have used against Obama and defend his right flank with embarrassing pandering that shadowed him through the general election. It was while trying to block a surge from Gingrich, for instance, that Romney told a debate audience that he was for the “self-deportation” of undocumented immigrants.

At the 2012 convention in Tampa, a group of longtime party hands, including Romney’s lawyer, Ben Ginsberg, gathered to discuss how to prevent a repeat of what had become known inside and outside the party as the “clown show.” Their aim was not just to protect the party but also to protect a potential President Romney from a primary challenge in 2016. They forced through new rules that would give future presumptive nominees more control over delegates in the event of a convention fight. They did away with the mandatory proportional delegate awards that encouraged long-shot candidacies. And, in a noticeably targeted effort, they raised the threshold that candidates needed to meet to enter their names into nomination, just as Ron Paul’s supporters were working to reach it. When John A. Boehner gaveled the rules in on a voice vote — a vote that many listeners heard as a tie, if not an outright loss — the hall erupted and a line of Ron Paul supporters walked off the floor in protest, along with many Tea Party members.

At a party meeting last winter, Reince Priebus, who as party chairman is charged with maintaining the support of all his constituencies, did restore some proportional primary and caucus voting, but only in states that held voting within a shortened two-week window. And he also condensed the nominating schedule to four and a half months from six months, and, for the first time required candidates to participate in a shortened debate schedule, determined by the party, not by the whims of the networks. (The panel that recommended those changes included names closely identified with the establishment — the former Bush White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, the Mississippi committeeman Haley Barbour and, notably, Jeb Bush’s closest adviser, Sally Bradshaw.)

Grass-roots activists have complained that the condensed schedule robs nonestablishment candidates — “movement candidates” like Carson — of the extra time they need to build momentum, money and organizations. But Priebus, who says the nomination could be close to settled by April, said it helped all the party’s constituencies when the nominee was decided quickly. “We don’t need a six-month slice-and-dice festival,” Priebus said when we spoke in mid-March. “While I can’t always control everyone’s mouth, I can control how long we can kill each other.”

All the rules changes were built to sidestep the problems of 2012. But the 2016 field is shaping up to be vastly different and far larger. A new Republican hints that he or she is considering a run seemingly every week. There are moderates like Gov. John Kasich of Ohio and former Gov. George Pataki of New York; no-compromise conservatives like Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania; business-wingers like the former Hewlett-Packard chief executive Carly Fiorina; one-of-a-kinds like Donald Trump — some 20 in all, a dozen or so who seem fairly serious about it. That opens the possibility of multiple candidates vying for all the major Republican constituencies, some of them possibly goaded along by super-PAC-funding billionaires, all of them trading wins and collecting delegates well into spring.

Giles says his candidate can capitalize on all that chaos. Rivals may laugh, but Giles argues that if Carson can make a respectable showing in Iowa, then win in South Carolina — or at least come in second should a home-state senator, Lindsey Graham, run — and come in second behind Bush or Senator Marco Rubio in their home state of Florida, he could be positioned to make a real run. But that would depend on avoiding pitfalls like Carson’s ill-considered comments on homosexuality. Rather than capitalizing on the chaos, Carson may only contribute to it.

Ben Carson is, in many ways, the ideal Republican presidential candidate. With a not-too-selective reading of his life story, conservative voters can — and do — see in him an inspiring, up-from-nowhere African-American who shares their beliefs, a right-wing answer to Barack Obama. Before he was born, his parents moved to Detroit from rural Tennessee as part of the second great migration. His father, Robert Solomon Carson, worked at a Cadillac factory. His mother, Sonya — who herself had grown up as one of 24 children and left school at third grade — cleaned houses. When Carson was 8, Sonya discovered that Robert was keeping a second family. She moved, with her two sons, into a rundown group house. It was in a part of town that Carson described to me as crawling with “big rats and roaches and all kinds of horrible things.” Sonya worked several jobs at a time and made up the shortfall with food stamps. (Carson has called for paring back the social safety net but not doing away with it.)

Carson recounts this story in his best-selling 1990 memoir, “Gifted Hands,” which also became the basis for a 2009 movie on TNT, starring Cuba Gooding Jr. as Carson. Raised as a Seventh Day Adventist, Carson realized that he wanted to become a physician during a church sermon about a missionary doctor who, while serving overseas, was almost attacked by thieves but found safety by putting his faith in God. When Carson, then 8, told his mother his new dream, “She said, ‘Absolutely, you could do it, you could do anything,’ ” he told me. Forced by his mother to read two extra books a week, he made it to Yale, then to medical school at the University of Michigan, where he decided to specialize in neurosurgery. He was selected for residency at Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, where he was named director of pediatric neurosurgery at 33, becoming the youngest person, and the first black person, to hold the title. He drew national attention by conducting a succession of operations that had never been performed successfully, most famously planning and managing the first separation of conjoined twins connected through major blood vessels in the brain.

Carson, a two-time Jimmy Carter voter, traces his conservative political awakening to a patient he met during the Reagan years. During a routine obstetrics rotation, he found himself treating an unwed pregnant teenager who had run away from her well-to-do parents. When Carson asked her how she was getting by, she informed him she was on public assistance; this led him to ponder the fact that the government was paying for the result of what he did not view as a “wise decision.” The incident, he says, fed his growing sense that the welfare system too often saps motivation and rewards irresponsible behavior. (When we spoke, he suggested that the government should cut off assistance to would-be unwed mothers, but only after warning them that it would do so within a certain amount of time, say five years. “I bet you’d see a dramatic decrease in unwed motherhood.”)

Carson’s friends at Hopkins say they do not remember him being particularly outspoken about his conservatism. He devoted most of his public engagement to urging poor kids in bad neighborhoods to use “these fancy brains God gave us,” through weekly school visits, student hospital tours and, ultimately, a multimillion-dollar scholarship program. “His issues were always medical care for the poor, education for the poor, equal opportunity — helping the less fortunate and really inspiring them as an example,” a mentor who named him to the chief pediatrics-neurosurgery post at Hopkins, Dr. Donlin Long, told me.

Even when Carson got the chance, in 1997, to speak in front of President Bill Clinton, at the national prayer breakfast, he mostly discussed the lack of role models for black children who were not sports stars or rappers. (There was possibly an oblique reference to Clinton’s sex scandals, when he told the audience that, if they are always honest, they won’t have to worry later about “skeletons in the closet.”)

Photo
 
Ben Carson at CPAC on Feb. 26 in Oxon Hill, Md. Credit Dolly Faibyshev for The New York Times

In 2011, Carson’s politics took a strident turn, mirroring that of many in his party during the Obama years. “America the Beautiful,” his sixth book, which he wrote with Candy Carson, his wife of 39 years, included a get-tough-on-illegal-immigration message and offered anti-establishment praise for the Tea Party. It suggested that blacks who voted for Obama only because he was black were themselves practicing a form of racism. (Earlier this year he admitted to Buzzfeed that portions of the book were lifted directly from several sources without proper attribution.) His prayer-breakfast performance in 2013, and the extremity of his remarks in the months afterward (Obamacare is the worst thing since slavery; the United States is “very much like Nazi Germany”; allowing same-sex marriage could lead to allowing bestiality), left some of his old friends bewildered. Students at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine protested his planned convocation address there in 2013, and he eventually backed out. When I asked Carson about the view at Hopkins that he had changed, he said his themes are still the same: “hard work, self-reliance, helping other people.” If he had become more overtly political, he said, it was only because the Obama years had led him to believe that “we’re really moving in a direction that is very, very destructive.”

None of this went unnoticed by campaign professionals. In August 2013, John Philip Sousa IV and Vernon Robinson, each of whom professes to be a virtual stranger to Carson, and who had previously been active in the anti-illegal-immigration movement, started the National Draft Ben Carson for President Committee. Sousa was just coming off a campaign to defend the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, Joe Arpaio, from a recall effort, and he told me that he found Carson’s lack of political experience refreshing. “We have 500 guys and gals with probably a collective 5,000 years experience, and look at the mess we’re in,” he said.

Many others in the party feel the same way. Carson’s PAC finished 2014 with more than $13 million in donations, more than Ready for Hillary. Much of its money has gone toward further fund-raising, but Sousa — the great-grandson of the famous composer — points out that their effort has already built far more than just a war chest, organizing leaders in all 99 of Iowa’s counties. Regardless, Carson credits the fund-raising success of Sousa and Robinson with persuading him to enter the race.

Very early the morning after the job interview, Carson was in a black S.U.V., heading from Washington to the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in Oxon Hill, Md., where he was to give the opening candidate speech of the Conservative Political Action Conference. The event, which functions as an early tryout for Republican presidential contenders, tends to skew rightward in its audience, drawing many of the same sorts of people who shouted at Boehner in Tampa. As such, it tends to favor anti-establishment candidates, but the news leading up to this year’s event was that Jeb Bush hoped to make inroads there.

It was still dark when we set out, and I joked with Carson about the hour, telling him he’d better get used to it. He retorted that his career in pediatric brain surgery made him no stranger to early mornings. This is a big theme of Carson’s presidential pitch: that neither the rigors of the campaign nor those of the White House can faze a man who held children’s lives in his hands. His life in brain surgery has prepared him for the presidency, he maintains, better than lives in politics have for his rivals. At the very least, he says, it conditioned him against getting too worked up about any problem that isn’t life threatening. “I mean, it’s grueling, but interestingly enough, I don’t feel the pressure,” he said.

At the convention hall, we were quickly surrounded by admirers. Two women were already waiting to meet him — white, middle-aged volunteers for Carson’s super PAC, who had traveled from South Carolina. One of them, Chris Horne, was holding a dog-eared and taped Bible. A founding member of the Charleston Tea Party who went on to work for Gingrich’s successful South Carolina primary campaign in 2012, Horne lamented over the attacks that Carson was sure to face. “You served us, you served the Lord, just don’t let them steal that from you,” she said. Her friend told him, “You’ve got God behind you!” Such religious evocations trailed Carson constantly while I walked the CPAC floor with him. Evangelicals are impressed not only with his devotion to their politics but also with his career path; as one of them told me, what’s more pro-life than saving babies?

During our ride to the conference, Carson told me his speech was not looking to “feed the beast.” When his appointed time came, he kept his remarks as tame as promised. “Real compassion” meant “using our intellect” to help people “climb out of dependency and realize the American dream,” he said. The national debt is going to “destroy us,” Obamacare was about “redistribution and control,” but Republicans better come forward with their own alternative before they repeal it, he said.

Because his speech was first, and it started several minutes early, the auditorium was slow to fill. Still, the first day saw a crush of people seeking autographs and pictures as he roamed the hall. The Draft Carson committee’s 150 volunteers swarmed the auditorium, collecting emails and handing out “Run Ben Run” stickers. After a quick interview with Sean Hannity, the conservative-radio and Fox News host — his second in two days — Carson was off to Tampa.

In the hours that followed his talk, the hall offered a view in miniature of what the next 12 to 14 months might hold for the party. Chris Christie, sitting across from the tough-minded talk-radio host Laura Ingraham, boasted about his multiple vetoes of Planned Parenthood funding, his refusal to raise income taxes and his belief that “sometimes people need to be told to sit down and shut up.” Cruz, an audience favorite, warning his fellow Republicans against falling for a “squishy moderate,” declared, “Take all 125,000 I.R.S. agents and put ’em on our Southern border!” Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, surging in polls, boasted that if he could face down the 100,000 union supporters who protested his legislation limiting collective bargaining for public employees, he could certainly handle ISIS. The next day, the traditional CPAC favorite Rand Paul spoke, packing the hall with his supporters who chanted “President Paul.” He warned, counter to the overall hawkish tenor of the event, that “we should not succumb to the notion that a government inept at home will somehow become successful abroad.” But he also vowed to end foreign aid to countries whose citizens are seen burning American flags. “Not one penny more to these haters of America.”

Perhaps the defining moment came near the end of the conference, when Jeb Bush spoke. In a neat trick of political gamesmanship — and a show of establishment muscle — his team had bused in an ample cheering section for the dozens of cameras on hand for his appearance. But a small contingent of Tea Party activists and Rand Paul supporters staged a walk out. When Bush began a question-and-answer session, they turned and left the auditorium to chant “U.S.A., U.S.A.” in the hallway, led by a man in colonial garb waving a huge “Don’t Tread on Me” banner. Plenty of other detractors stayed in the hall and peppered Bush’s remarks with booing as he stood by positions unpopular with the conservative grass roots: support for the Common Core standards and an immigration overhaul that provides a “path to legal status” for undocumented immigrants. Bush took it all in good humor, but finally seemed to give up.

“For those who made an ‘oo’ sound — is that what it was? — I’m marking you down as neutral,” he said. “And I want to be your second choice.”

Bush strategists told me they would not repeat Romney’s mistakes. Of course they would love to glide to an early nomination, they said, but they are prepared for a long contest and won’t be wasting any energy bending under pressure from a Paul or a Cruz or a Carson.

No one doubts that the pressure will increase, though. Despite the best wishes of the party’s leaders, GOP primary voters have given little indication that they will narrow the field quickly.

Before I left, I spotted Newt Gingrich, himself a fleeting presidential front-runner during those strange primary days of 2012. I asked him whether he thought all the party maneuvering — all the attempts to change the rules and fast-track the process — would preclude someone from presenting the sort of outside primary challenge he had carried out in the last election.

“No,” he told me, as if it was the most obvious thing in the world. “Look at where Ben Carson is right now.”

Jim Rutenberg is the chief political correspondent for the magazine. His most recent feature was about Megyn Kelly.

Ben Carson Says He’ll Seek 2016 G.O.P. Nomination

Mr. Mankiewicz, an Oscar-nominated screenwriter for “I Want to Live!,” also wrote episodes of television shows such as “Star Trek” and “Marcus Welby, M.D.”

Don Mankiewicz, Screenwriter in a Family Film Tradition, Dies at 93
Children playing last week in Sandtown-Winchester, the Baltimore neighborhood where Freddie Gray was raised. One young resident called it “a tough community.”
Todd Heisler/The New York Times

Children playing last week in Sandtown-Winchester, the Baltimore neighborhood where Freddie Gray was raised. One young resident called it “a tough community.”

Hard but Hopeful Home to ‘Lot of Freddies’

Hard but Hopeful Home to ‘Lot of Freddies’

A former member of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, Mr. Smedvig helped found the wide-ranging Empire Brass quintet.

Rolf Smedvig, Trumpeter in the Empire Brass, Dies at 62

biaya paket umroh mei umrohdepag.com
harga berangkat umroh awal tahun di Pulo Gadung jakarta
biaya paket umroh awal tahun di Cilangkap jakarta
paket umroh juni bekasi timur
harga umrah mei di Pondok Kelapa jakarta
biaya paket umroh desember di Makasar jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah juni di Munjul jakarta
paket promo umroh ramadhan tangerang
paket promo berangkat umrah januari di Bidaracina jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah juni bogor
paket berangkat umroh juni di Kampung Tengah jakarta
paket promo umroh desember di Kelapa Dua Wetan jakarta
paket promo umroh awal tahun di Matraman jakarta
paket umroh ramadhan di Kebon Pala jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah ramadhan di Ciracas jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh juni di Cipinang Cempedak jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah ramadhan di Balekambang jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh april di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
biaya paket umroh akhir tahun di Cipinang Melayu jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh april di Cililitan jakarta
biaya umrah februari di Pal Meriam jakarta
harga berangkat umrah januari di Cipayung jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah ramadhan di Ceger jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah ramadhan di Pasar Rebo jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh desember di Rambutan jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah awal tahun di Cipayung jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh mei di Kalisari jakarta
paket promo umroh juni di Duren Sawit jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah april di Klender jakarta
paket promo umrah awal tahun di Cipinang Cempedak jakarta
harga umrah awal tahun di Bidaracina jakarta
biaya paket umroh april di Cakung Barat jakarta
biaya paket umroh desember di Kampung Baru jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah mei di Cawang jakarta
biaya umroh juni di Halim Perdanakusuma jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh april di Pisangan Baru jakarta
paket promo umrah akhir tahun di Makasar jakarta
biaya umroh awal tahun di Jatinegara jakarta
paket promo umrah awal tahun di Pondok Ranggon jakarta
biaya paket umrah april di Jatinegara jakarta
harga berangkat umroh maret di Cipinang jakarta
paket umrah januari di Batuampar jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah maret di Ciracas jakarta
promo umrah januari di Ciracas jakarta
harga berangkat umroh januari di Cibubur jakarta
harga berangkat umrah januari di Pinang Ranti jakarta
paket umrah akhir tahun di Jati jakarta
harga berangkat umrah ramadhan bogor
biaya paket umroh juni di Bambu Apus jakarta
biaya umrah mei di Pondok Kopi jakarta
biaya umrah april di Bambu Apus jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh ramadhan di Cakung Barat jakarta
biaya umroh januari di Cililitan jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah juni di Munjul jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Pondok Kopi jakarta
paket promo umroh februari bekasi barat
paket umroh awal tahun di Utan Kayu Utara jakarta
paket promo umroh april di Rambutan jakarta
paket umroh akhir tahun di Kebon Manggis jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah februari di Penggilingan jakarta
biaya paket umrah mei di Jatinegara jakarta
paket berangkat umrah maret di Ujung Menteng jakarta
paket umroh awal tahun di Cipayung jakarta
biaya paket umroh februari di Cipinang Melayu jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah ramadhan di Rambutan jakarta
paket promo umrah mei di Ceger jakarta
harga umroh juni di Pulo Gadung jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah desember di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh awal tahun di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
promo berangkat umrah awal tahun di Pisangan Baru jakarta
harga berangkat umrah awal tahun bogor
biaya paket berangkat umroh desember di Matraman jakarta
paket berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Pisangan Baru jakarta
harga umrah maret di Dukuh jakarta
promo berangkat umrah maret di Pekayon jakarta
paket promo umroh desember di Malaka Sari jakarta
paket promo umroh mei di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya umroh april di Rawa Terate jakarta
paket promo umrah februari di Malaka Jaya jakarta
biaya umroh juni di Kampung Tengah jakarta
paket umrah februari di Cipinang Besar Utara jakarta
promo berangkat umrah mei bekasi utara
biaya paket umroh maret di Pulo Gadung jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah desember di Malaka Sari jakarta
harga umroh akhir tahun di Pondok Kelapa jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah desember di Lubang Buaya jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Pondok Ranggon jakarta
harga umrah januari bogor
promo umrah april di Kayu Putih jakarta
harga umrah akhir tahun di Bali Mester jakarta
harga umroh januari di Kalisari jakarta
biaya umroh awal tahun di Cawang jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah maret di Jatinegara Kaum jakarta
harga paket umrah februari di Pulo Gadung jakarta
paket umroh ramadhan di Pinang Ranti jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh juni di Ujung Menteng jakarta
biaya umroh mei di Kampung Tengah jakarta
paket promo umrah februari bekasi barat
biaya umroh maret di Munjul jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Matraman jakarta