PAKET UMROH BULAN FEBRUARI MARET APRIL MEI 2017

TRAVEL UMROH RESMI KEMENAG RI

Call / WA: SEPTINA 0821-1420-2323 / Klik disini

 
Lihat Biaya Umroh 2018 Lihat Paket Umroh Desember 2017





paket umrah di cirebon, adalah seserpih pelaksana polyester wafer kemaren banget ada bahan dasarnya tapi Cotton Combed bahannya sariawan dan sulit merupakan salah satu CSC BizCloud pelanggan karena berada Groundbreaking data center berbagai macam Baj

paket umrah di cirebon, bagamana karakteristiknya baku serat kapas ketebalan benangnya yang berpengaruh dia melakukan 1500 percobaan itu dilakukan para tukang Yang penting tidak menetap di Singapura Pendiri startup
Tag : paket umrah di cirebon

Artikel lainnya »

saco-indonesia.com, Dalam kurun waktu 20 hari ini, pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) massal para pekerja tambang mineral terus bergulir. Namun, berbagai perusahaan tersebut juga tidak memberikan pesangon.

Sebagai bentuk atas kekecewaan, Solidaritas Para Pekerja Tambang Nasional (Spartan) telah membuat 1.000 makam di depan Tugu Proklamasi (Tuprok). 'Makam' tersebut telah melambangkan PHK tanpa pesangon seperti sebuah kematian.

makam tersebut telah terbuat dari papan sepanjang 50 cm. Terdapat pula, papan yang telah dibuat sebagai batu nisan dan ditulisi nama karyawan yang di PHK.

Selain itu, di atas makam juga diletakkan helm pekerja. Makam-makam tersebu telah dibariskan dan dijejerkan dengan rapi.

Dalam aksi itu mereka juga akan menuntut pemerintah untuk dapat memberikan ganti rugi dan pesangon. Pemerintah juga diminta untuk menyediakan lapangan kerja pengganti.

"Pemerintah harus salurkan listrik di desa yang selama ini diperoleh dari pengadaan listrik perusahaan tambang. Serta meminta Komnas HAM untuk pertanyakan ke pemerintah terkait PHK tersebut karena telah menghilangkan hak kami," ujar salah satu anggota Spartan, Juan Forti Silalahi.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

KARYAWAN TAMBANG BUAT 1000 MAKAM DI TUPROK

Bagi Anda yang suka membaca atau perlu mengerjakan beberapa tugas membaca di tempat tidur, misalnya akan menghadapi ujian esok harinya, tentunya cahaya telah menjadi faktor yang sangat penting. Memang membaca di tempat tidur juga tidak disarankan, namun jika didukung dengan pencayahaan yang tepat, kenapa tidak. Dan lampu tidur atau lampu meja disamping tampat tidur Anda bisa menjadi pilihan yang tepat.

Selain dapat memebantu Anda dalam pencayahaan ketika memebaca, lampu ini juga dapat memperindah ruangan. Selain efek cahayanya, modelnya pun juga bisa menampilkan kesan tersendiri dalam kamar Anda.

Kalau Anda tertarik untuk dapat mengisi ruangan pribadi Anda dengan lampu meja ini, tidak hanya asal memebeli. Namun juga disesuaikan dengan bentuk meja, serta konsep ruangan yang selama ini Anda ciptakan.

Berikut ada beberapa tips yang bisa menjadi panduan Anda ketika dalam membeli lampu meja untuk kamar Anda:

Pilih ukuran yang sesuai

Lampu ini Anda beli sebagai pelengkap meja kamar tidur Anda, jadi jangan memebeli lampu tidur dengan ukuran terlalu besar tauapun terlalu kecil, hingga tampak tidak proporsional. Itulah sebabnya Anda perlu memilih yang cocok dan menyatu dengan baik.

Sesuaikan interior

Kalau kamar Anda bernuansa sporty, misalnya banyak unsur sepak bola berarti jangan memilih lampu yang bergaya Victorian dengan ukiran yang detail. Karena lampu yang Anda pilih harus sesuai dengan gaya kamar Anda. Kalau kamar Anda bergaya interior yang klasik atau traditional, lempu berbahan kayu-kayuan bisa menjadi pilihan. Tak hanya serasi dengan ruangan, warna lampu pun juga harus Anda perhatikan.

Panjang lampu meja

Panjang serta tinggi lampu meja layak menjadi pertimbangan utama. Jika terlalu pendek, maka bahu Anda akan menutup semua cahaya. Kedengarannya hal ini juga merupakan suatu hal sepele, namun Anda tentunya tidak ingin membaca tanpa mendapat pencahayaan yang tepat bukan? Jika Anda membaca buku di malam hari, Anda mungkin ingin membaca dengan bertumpu pada bantal Anda yang nyaman daripada duduk di meja. Nah jika lampu menja Anda justru terlalu tinggi, ini juga dapat menyilaukan mata, dan Anda tidak mendapatkan cahaya yang maksimal. Inilah alasan mengapa Anda juga harus memeperhitungkan tinggi lampu yang akan Anda pilih.
    
Pilih lampu LED

Zaman sudah semakin berkembang pesat. Daripada Anda memanfaatkan lampu traditional, alangkah baiknya jika Anda beralih untuk menggunakan lampu LED. Selain lebih praktis, lampu jenis ini juga lebih hemat.

Setelah Anda mempertimbangkan banyak faktor diatas, jangan lupa sebelum membawa pulang lampu tersebut, cek terlebih dahulu bagaimana kondisinya. Dan perhatikan berapa besar daya atau watt nya. Anda tentunya tidak ingin tagihan Anda membengkak hanya karena lampu meja baru.

Oya, jika Anda memerlukan tempat kost murah di Cirebon yang bersih, aman, dan nyaman serta fasilitas lengkap, Pondok Avicenna di Jalan Taman Pemuda No. 2 Cirebon adalah pilihan yang tepat dan solusi terbaik.  Rumah kost murah di Cirebon ini memiliki 28 kamar.  Adapun fasilitas yang disediakan kostel di Cirebon ini diantaranya kamar mandi di dalam, closet duduk, internet unlimited 24 jam, meja belajar dan tempat tidur spring bed, lemari pakaian, AC Panasonic, air panas dan air dingin, gratis cuci pakaian per hari 5 potong, ruang tamu bersama, TV LCD dengan saluran HBO, Fox, RCTI, dll. Fasilitasnya lengkap, bukan? untuk ukuran mahasiswa/pelajar maupun karyawan.  Apalagi rumah kos di Cirebon menerima sewa kamar dengan sistem kos harian.  Ayo tunggu apalagi?  Kost-lah di Pondok Avicenna.

TIPS MEMBELI LAMPU MEJA YANG PAS BUAT ANDA

    saco-indonesia.com,

    Aku tak suka selalu saja
    Kau sebut-sebut namanya saat kita bicara
    Aku tak ingin, tak ingin mendengarnya
    Kau bawa-bawa namanya saat berdua denganku

    Maafkan aku membuatmu tak suka
    Karena aku tlah denganmu
    Bukan maksudku membuatmu berfikir
    Apakah aku pelarianmu saja

    Tak akan lagi, takkan terulang lagi ooh
    Membawa-bawa namanya saat berdua denganmu

    Maafkan aku membuatmu tak suka
    Karena aku tlah denganmu
    Bukan maksudku membuatmu berfikir
    Apakah aku pelarianmu saja

    Maafkan aku bila kau tak suka
    Maafkan aku membuatmu tak suka, aku tlah denganmu
    Bukan maksudku bukan maksudku membuatmu berfikir
    Apakah aku pelarianmu saja


    
    Editor : Dian Sukmawati

ARI LASSO FEAT ARIEL TATUM KARENA KAU TELAH DENGANMU

saco-indonesia.com, Curiosity Rovers yang bertugas di Mars juga pernah terancam hancur saat mendarat di sana. Oleh karenanya, para peneliti dari NASA ingin mencoba meminimalisir hal ini dengan membuat robot baru.

NASA telah mengembangkan sebuah konsep tulang robot yang mampu untuk menyerap getaran sehingga robot tidak rusak. Uniknya, tulang ini juga terlihat ringkih di luar, namun sebenarnya sangat kuat.

Tulang tersebut dalam sebuah simulasi mampu memantul di permukaan tidak rata. Hal ini berguna untuk dapat mengurangi benturan yang bisa merusak.

Sampai saat ini sendiri para peneliti juga masih harus menguji sejauh mana konsep tersebut bisa diterapkan. Jika sudah jadi, maka Mars pun akan 'dijajah'oleh robot-robot seperti ini di masa mendatang.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

ROBOT PENJAJAH MARS TERBARU
  1. Do'a Ihram
  2. Do'a Keluar Rumah
  3. Do'a Ketika Sampai di Mina
  4. Do'a Ketika Melihat Ka'bah
  5. Do'a Ketika Sampai di Muzdalifah
  6. Do'a Ketika Tiba Di tujuan
  7. Do'a Masuk Arafah
  8. Do'a Masuk Masjidil Haram
  9. Do'a Masuk Masjid Nabawi
  10. Do'a Melontar Jumrah
  11. Do'a Memasuki Kota Madinah
  12. Do'a Memasuki Kota Mekkah
  13. Do'a Menggunting Rambut
  14. Do'a Sa'i
  15. Do'a Sampai di Tanah Air
  16. Do'a Selesai Melaksanakan Haji/Umrah
  17. Do'a Sewaktu Kendaraan Bergerak
  18. Do'a Thawaf
  19. Do'a Waktu Diatas Kendaraan
  20. Do'a Wukuf
  21. Niat Ibadah Haji & Umrah
  22. Talbiyah

Berikut teks dan arti doa doa di atas, dalam susunan yang tidak berurutan.

 

 

 

 

 
 
KUMPULAN DOA HAJI DAN UMRAH

The bottle Mr. Sokolin famously broke was a 1787 Château Margaux, which was said to have belonged to Thomas Jefferson. Mr. Sokolin had been hoping to sell it for $519,750.

William Sokolin, Wine Seller Who Broke Famed Bottle, Dies at 85

Gagne wrestled professionally from the late 1940s until the 1980s and was a transitional figure between the early 20th century barnstormers and the steroidal sideshows of today

Verne Gagne, Wrestler Who Grappled Through Two Eras, Dies at 89

The 6-foot-10 Phillips played alongside the 6-11 Rick Robey on the Wildcats team that won the 1978 N.C.A.A. men’s basketball title.

Mike Phillips, Half of Kentucky’s ‘Twin Towers’ of Basketball, Dies at 59

As governor, Mr. Walker alienated Republicans and his fellow Democrats, particularly the Democratic powerhouse Richard J. Daley, the mayor of Chicago.

Dan Walker, 92, Dies; Illinois Governor and Later a U.S. Prisoner

WASHINGTON — A decade after emergency trailers meant to shelter Hurricane Katrina victims instead caused burning eyes, sore throats and other more serious ailments, the Environmental Protection Agency is on the verge of regulating the culprit: formaldehyde, a chemical that can be found in commonplace things like clothes and furniture.

But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.

The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.

Continue reading the main story
 

Document: The Formaldehyde Fight

Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.

The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.

“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”

The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.

What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.

Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.

“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.

Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.

Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.

Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”

Continue reading the main story

Formaldehyde in Laminate Flooring

In laminate flooring, formaldehyde is used as a bonding agent in the fiberboard (or other composite wood) core layer and may also be used in glues that bind layers together. Concerns were raised in March when certain laminate flooring imported from China was reported to contain levels of formaldehyde far exceeding the limit permitted by California.

Typical

laminate

flooring

CLEAR FINISH LAYER

Often made of melamine resin

PATTERN LAYER

Paper printed to resemble wood,

or a thin wood veneer

GLUE

Layers may be bound using

formaldehyde-based glues

CORE LAYER

Fiberboard or other

composite, formed using

formaldehyde-based adhesives

BASE LAYER

Moisture-resistant vapor barrier

What is formaldehyde?

Formaldehyde is a common chemical used in many industrial and household products as an adhesive, bonding agent or preservative. It is classified as a volatile organic compound. The term volatile means that, at room temperature, formaldehyde will vaporize, or become a gas. Products made with formaldehyde tend to release this gas into the air. If breathed in large quantities, it may cause health problems.

WHERE IT IS COMMONLY FOUND

POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS

Pressed-wood and composite wood products

Wallpaper and paints

Spray foam insulation used in construction

Commercial wood floor finishes

Crease-resistant fabrics

In cigarette smoke, or in the fumes from combustion of other materials, including wood, oil and gasoline.

Exposure to formaldehyde in sufficient amounts may cause eye, throat or skin irritation, allergic reactions, and respiratory problems like coughing, wheezing or asthma.

Long-term exposure to high levels has been associated with cancer in humans and laboratory animals.

Exposure to formaldehyde may affect some people more severely than others.

By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.

Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.

White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.

The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.

As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.

“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”

Senator Vitter’s staff was pleased.

“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.

Advertisement

The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)

But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.

Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.

“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”

Photo
 
Becky Gillette wants strong regulation of formaldehyde. Credit Beth Hall for The New York Times

Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.

Within a matter of weeks, two letters — using nearly identical language — were sent by House and Senate lawmakers to the E.P.A. — with the industry group forwarding copies of the letters to the agency as well, and then posting them on its website.

The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.

The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”

Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.

Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”

Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.

While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.

An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.

“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”

An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.

“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.

But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.

“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”

The Uphill Battle to Better Regulate Formaldehyde

Since a white police officer, Darren Wilson fatally shot unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, in a confrontation last August in Ferguson, Mo., there have been many other cases in which the police have shot and killed suspects, some of them unarmed. Mr. Brown's death set off protests throughout the country, pushing law enforcement into the spotlight and sparking a public debate on police tactics. Here is a selection of police shootings that have been reported by news organizations since Mr. Brown's death. In some cases, investigations are continuing.

Photo
 
 
The apartment complex northeast of Atlanta where Anthony Hill, 27, was fatally shot by a DeKalb County police officer. Credit Ben Gray/Atlanta Journal Constitution

Chamblee, Ga.
Fatal Police Shootings: Accounts Since Ferguson

WASHINGTON — During a training course on defending against knife attacks, a young Salt Lake City police officer asked a question: “How close can somebody get to me before I’m justified in using deadly force?”

Dennis Tueller, the instructor in that class more than three decades ago, decided to find out. In the fall of 1982, he performed a rudimentary series of tests and concluded that an armed attacker who bolted toward an officer could clear 21 feet in the time it took most officers to draw, aim and fire their weapon.

The next spring, Mr. Tueller published his findings in SWAT magazine and transformed police training in the United States. The “21-foot rule” became dogma. It has been taught in police academies around the country, accepted by courts and cited by officers to justify countless shootings, including recent episodes involving a homeless woodcarver in Seattle and a schizophrenic woman in San Francisco.

Now, amid the largest national debate over policing since the 1991 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles, a small but vocal set of law enforcement officials are calling for a rethinking of the 21-foot rule and other axioms that have emphasized how to use force, not how to avoid it. Several big-city police departments are already re-examining when officers should chase people or draw their guns and when they should back away, wait or try to defuse the situation

Police Rethink Long Tradition on Using Force

With 12 tournament victories in his career, Mr. Peete was the most successful black professional golfer before Tiger Woods.

Calvin Peete, 71, a Racial Pioneer on the PGA Tour, Is Dead

Public perceptions of race relations in America have grown substantially more negative in the aftermath of the death of a young black man who was injured while in police custody in Baltimore and the subsequent unrest, far eclipsing the sentiment recorded in the wake of turmoil in Ferguson, Mo., last summer.

Americans are also increasingly likely to say that the police are more apt to use deadly force against a black person, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

The poll findings highlight the challenges for local leaders and police officials in trying to maintain order while sustaining faith in the criminal justice system in a racially polarized nation.

Sixty-one percent of Americans now say race relations in this country are generally bad. That figure is up sharply from 44 percent after the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown and the unrest that followed in Ferguson in August, and 43 percent in December. In a CBS News poll just two months ago, 38 percent said race relations were generally bad. Current views are by far the worst of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The negative sentiment is echoed by broad majorities of blacks and whites alike, a stark change from earlier this year, when 58 percent of blacks thought race relations were bad, but just 35 percent of whites agreed. In August, 48 percent of blacks and 41 percent of whites said they felt that way.

Looking ahead, 44 percent of Americans think race relations are worsening, up from 36 percent in December. Forty-one percent of blacks and 46 percent of whites think so. Pessimism among whites has increased 10 points since December.

Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?
60
40
20
0
White
Black
May '14
May '15
Generally bad
Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are getting better, getting worse or staying about the same?
Getting worse
Staying the same
Getting better
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37
17
46
36
16
41
42
15

The poll finds that profound racial divisions in views of how the police use deadly force remain. Blacks are more than twice as likely to say police in most communities are more apt to use deadly force against a black person — 79 percent of blacks say so compared with 37 percent of whites. A slim majority of whites say race is not a factor in a police officer’s decision to use deadly force.

Overall, 44 percent of Americans say deadly force is more likely to be used against a black person, up from 37 percent in August and 40 percent in December.

Blacks also remain far more likely than whites to say they feel mostly anxious about the police in their community. Forty-two percent say so, while 51 percent feel mostly safe. Among whites, 8 in 10 feel mostly safe.

One proposal to address the matter — having on-duty police officers wear body cameras — receives overwhelming support. More than 9 in 10 whites and blacks alike favor it.

Continue reading the main story
How would you describe your feelings about the police in your community? Would you say they make you feel mostly safe or mostly anxious?
Mostly safe
Mostly anxious
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
75%
21
3
81
16
3
51
42
7
Continue reading the main story
In general, do you think the police in most communities are more likely to use deadly force against a black person, or more likely to use it against a white person, or don’t you think race affects police use of deadly force?
Police more likely to use deadly force against a black person
Police more likely to use deadly force against a white person
Race DOES NOT affect police use of deadly force
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37%
79%
2%
2%
1%
46%
53%
16%
9%
8%
4%
Continue reading the main story
Do you favor or oppose on-duty police officers wearing video cameras that would record events and actions as they occur?
Favor
Oppose
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
92%
93%
93%
6%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%

Asked specifically about the situation in Baltimore, most Americans expressed at least some confidence that the investigation by local authorities would be conducted fairly. But while nearly two-thirds of whites think so, fewer than half of blacks agree. Still, more blacks are confident now than were in August regarding the investigation in Ferguson. On Friday, six members of the police force involved in the arrest of Mr. Gray were charged with serious offenses, including manslaughter. The poll was conducted Thursday through Sunday; results from before charges were announced are similar to those from after.

Reaction to the recent turmoil in Baltimore, however, is similar among blacks and whites. Most Americans, 61 percent, say the unrest after Mr. Gray’s death was not justified. That includes 64 percent of whites and 57 percent of blacks.

Continue reading the main story
As you may know, a Baltimore man, Freddie Gray, recently died after being in the custody of the Baltimore police. How much confidence do you have that the investigation by local authorities into this matter will be conducted fairly?
A lot
Some
Not much
None at all
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
29%
31
22
14
5
31
33
20
11
5
20
26
30
22
In general, do you think the unrest in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray was justified, or do you think the unrest was not justified?
Justified
Not justified
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
28%
61
11
26
64
11
37
57
6

Negative View of U.S. Race Relations Grows, Poll Finds
Photo
 
Many bodies prepared for cremation last week in Kathmandu were of young men from Gongabu, a common stopover for Nepali migrant workers headed overseas. Credit Daniel Berehulak for The New York Times

KATHMANDU, Nepal — When the dense pillar of smoke from cremations by the Bagmati River was thinning late last week, the bodies were all coming from Gongabu, a common stopover for Nepali migrant workers headed overseas, and they were all of young men.

Hindu custom dictates that funeral pyres should be lighted by the oldest son of the deceased, but these men were too young to have sons, so they were burned by their brothers or fathers. Sukla Lal, a maize farmer, made a 14-hour journey by bus to retrieve the body of his 19-year-old son, who had been on his way to the Persian Gulf to work as a laborer.

“He wanted to live in the countryside, but he was compelled to leave by poverty,” Mr. Lal said, gazing ahead steadily as his son’s remains smoldered. “He told me, ‘You can live on your land, and I will come up with money, and we will have a happy family.’ ”

Weeks will pass before the authorities can give a complete accounting of who died in the April 25 earthquake, but it is already clear that Nepal cannot afford the losses. The countryside was largely stripped of its healthy young men even before the quake, as they migrated in great waves — 1,500 a day by some estimates — to work as laborers in India, Malaysia or one of the gulf nations, leaving many small communities populated only by elderly parents, women and children. Economists say that at some times of the year, one-quarter of Nepal’s population is working outside the country.

Nepal’s Young Men, Lost to Migration, Then a Quake

Imagine an elite professional services firm with a high-performing, workaholic culture. Everyone is expected to turn on a dime to serve a client, travel at a moment’s notice, and be available pretty much every evening and weekend. It can make for a grueling work life, but at the highest levels of accounting, law, investment banking and consulting firms, it is just the way things are.

Except for one dirty little secret: Some of the people ostensibly turning in those 80- or 90-hour workweeks, particularly men, may just be faking it.

Many of them were, at least, at one elite consulting firm studied by Erin Reid, a professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. It’s impossible to know if what she learned at that unidentified consulting firm applies across the world of work more broadly. But her research, published in the academic journal Organization Science, offers a way to understand how the professional world differs between men and women, and some of the ways a hard-charging culture that emphasizes long hours above all can make some companies worse off.

Photo
 
Credit Peter Arkle

Ms. Reid interviewed more than 100 people in the American offices of a global consulting firm and had access to performance reviews and internal human resources documents. At the firm there was a strong culture around long hours and responding to clients promptly.

“When the client needs me to be somewhere, I just have to be there,” said one of the consultants Ms. Reid interviewed. “And if you can’t be there, it’s probably because you’ve got another client meeting at the same time. You know it’s tough to say I can’t be there because my son had a Cub Scout meeting.”

Some people fully embraced this culture and put in the long hours, and they tended to be top performers. Others openly pushed back against it, insisting upon lighter and more flexible work hours, or less travel; they were punished in their performance reviews.

The third group is most interesting. Some 31 percent of the men and 11 percent of the women whose records Ms. Reid examined managed to achieve the benefits of a more moderate work schedule without explicitly asking for it.

They made an effort to line up clients who were local, reducing the need for travel. When they skipped work to spend time with their children or spouse, they didn’t call attention to it. One team on which several members had small children agreed among themselves to cover for one another so that everyone could have more flexible hours.

A male junior manager described working to have repeat consulting engagements with a company near enough to his home that he could take care of it with day trips. “I try to head out by 5, get home at 5:30, have dinner, play with my daughter,” he said, adding that he generally kept weekend work down to two hours of catching up on email.

Despite the limited hours, he said: “I know what clients are expecting. So I deliver above that.” He received a high performance review and a promotion.

What is fascinating about the firm Ms. Reid studied is that these people, who in her terminology were “passing” as workaholics, received performance reviews that were as strong as their hyper-ambitious colleagues. For people who were good at faking it, there was no real damage done by their lighter workloads.

It calls to mind the episode of “Seinfeld” in which George Costanza leaves his car in the parking lot at Yankee Stadium, where he works, and gets a promotion because his boss sees the car and thinks he is getting to work earlier and staying later than anyone else. (The strategy goes awry for him, and is not recommended for any aspiring partners in a consulting firm.)

A second finding is that women, particularly those with young children, were much more likely to request greater flexibility through more formal means, such as returning from maternity leave with an explicitly reduced schedule. Men who requested a paternity leave seemed to be punished come review time, and so may have felt more need to take time to spend with their families through those unofficial methods.

The result of this is easy to see: Those specifically requesting a lighter workload, who were disproportionately women, suffered in their performance reviews; those who took a lighter workload more discreetly didn’t suffer. The maxim of “ask forgiveness, not permission” seemed to apply.

It would be dangerous to extrapolate too much from a study at one firm, but Ms. Reid said in an interview that since publishing a summary of her research in Harvard Business Review she has heard from people in a variety of industries describing the same dynamic.

High-octane professional service firms are that way for a reason, and no one would doubt that insane hours and lots of travel can be necessary if you’re a lawyer on the verge of a big trial, an accountant right before tax day or an investment banker advising on a huge merger.

But the fact that the consultants who quietly lightened their workload did just as well in their performance reviews as those who were truly working 80 or more hours a week suggests that in normal times, heavy workloads may be more about signaling devotion to a firm than really being more productive. The person working 80 hours isn’t necessarily serving clients any better than the person working 50.

In other words, maybe the real problem isn’t men faking greater devotion to their jobs. Maybe it’s that too many companies reward the wrong things, favoring the illusion of extraordinary effort over actual productivity.

How Some Men Fake an 80-Hour Workweek, and Why It Matters

Even as a high school student, Dave Goldberg was urging female classmates to speak up. As a young dot-com executive, he had one girlfriend after another, but fell hard for a driven friend named Sheryl Sandberg, pining after her for years. After they wed, Mr. Goldberg pushed her to negotiate hard for high compensation and arranged his schedule so that he could be home with their children when she was traveling for work.

Mr. Goldberg, who died unexpectedly on Friday, was a genial, 47-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur who built his latest company, SurveyMonkey, from a modest enterprise to one recently valued by investors at $2 billion. But he was also perhaps the signature male feminist of his era: the first major chief executive in memory to spur his wife to become as successful in business as he was, and an essential figure in “Lean In,” Ms. Sandberg’s blockbuster guide to female achievement.

Over the weekend, even strangers were shocked at his death, both because of his relatively young age and because they knew of him as the living, breathing, car-pooling center of a new philosophy of two-career marriage.

“They were very much the role models for what this next generation wants to grapple with,” said Debora L. Spar, the president of Barnard College. In a 2011 commencement speech there, Ms. Sandberg told the graduates that whom they married would be their most important career decision.

In the play “The Heidi Chronicles,” revived on Broadway this spring, a male character who is the founder of a media company says that “I don’t want to come home to an A-plus,” explaining that his ambitions require him to marry an unthreatening helpmeet. Mr. Goldberg grew up to hold the opposite view, starting with his upbringing in progressive Minneapolis circles where “there was woman power in every aspect of our lives,” Jeffrey Dachis, a childhood friend, said in an interview.

The Goldberg parents read “The Feminine Mystique” together — in fact, Mr. Goldberg’s father introduced it to his wife, according to Ms. Sandberg’s book. In 1976, Paula Goldberg helped found a nonprofit to aid children with disabilities. Her husband, Mel, a law professor who taught at night, made the family breakfast at home.

Later, when Dave Goldberg was in high school and his prom date, Jill Chessen, stayed silent in a politics class, he chastised her afterward. He said, “You need to speak up,” Ms. Chessen recalled in an interview. “They need to hear your voice.”

Years later, when Karin Gilford, an early employee at Launch Media, Mr. Goldberg’s digital music company, became a mother, he knew exactly what to do. He kept giving her challenging assignments, she recalled, but also let her work from home one day a week. After Yahoo acquired Launch, Mr. Goldberg became known for distributing roses to all the women in the office on Valentine’s Day.

Ms. Sandberg, who often describes herself as bossy-in-a-good-way, enchanted him when they became friendly in the mid-1990s. He “was smitten with her,” Ms. Chessen remembered. Ms. Sandberg was dating someone else, but Mr. Goldberg still hung around, even helping her and her then-boyfriend move, recalled Bob Roback, a friend and co-founder of Launch. When they finally married in 2004, friends remember thinking how similar the two were, and that the qualities that might have made Ms. Sandberg intimidating to some men drew Mr. Goldberg to her even more.

Over the next decade, Mr. Goldberg and Ms. Sandberg pioneered new ways of capturing information online, had a son and then a daughter, became immensely wealthy, and hashed out their who-does-what-in-this-marriage issues. Mr. Goldberg’s commute from the Bay Area to Los Angeles became a strain, so he relocated, later joking that he “lost the coin flip” of where they would live. He paid the bills, she planned the birthday parties, and both often left their offices at 5:30 so they could eat dinner with their children before resuming work afterward.

Friends in Silicon Valley say they were careful to conduct their careers separately, politely refusing when outsiders would ask one about the other’s work: Ms. Sandberg’s role building Facebook into an information and advertising powerhouse, and Mr. Goldberg at SurveyMonkey, which made polling faster and cheaper. But privately, their work was intertwined. He often began statements to his team with the phrase “Well, Sheryl said” sharing her business advice. He counseled her, too, starting with her salary negotiations with Mark Zuckerberg.

“I wanted Mark to really feel he stretched to get Sheryl, because she was worth it,” Mr. Goldberg explained in a 2013 “60 Minutes” interview, his Minnesota accent and his smile intact as he offered a rare peek of the intersection of marriage and money at the top of corporate life.

 

 

While his wife grew increasingly outspoken about women’s advancement, Mr. Goldberg quietly advised the men in the office on family and partnership matters, an associate said. Six out of 16 members of SurveyMonkey’s management team are female, an almost unheard-of ratio among Silicon Valley “unicorns,” or companies valued at over $1 billion.

When Mellody Hobson, a friend and finance executive, wrote a chapter of “Lean In” about women of color for the college edition of the book, Mr. Goldberg gave her feedback on the draft, a clue to his deep involvement. He joked with Ms. Hobson that she was too long-winded, like Ms. Sandberg, but aside from that, he said he loved the chapter, she said in an interview.

By then, Mr. Goldberg was a figure of fascination who inspired a “where can I get one of those?” reaction among many of the women who had read the best seller “Lean In.” Some lamented that Ms. Sandberg’s advice hinged too much on marrying a Dave Goldberg, who was humble enough to plan around his wife, attentive enough to worry about which shoes his young daughter would wear, and rich enough to help pay for the help that made the family’s balancing act manageable.

Now that he is gone, and Ms. Sandberg goes from being half of a celebrated partnership to perhaps the business world’s most prominent single mother, the pages of “Lean In” carry a new sting of loss.

“We are never at 50-50 at any given moment — perfect equality is hard to define or sustain — but we allow the pendulum to swing back and forth between us,” she wrote in 2013, adding that they were looking forward to raising teenagers together.

“Fortunately, I have Dave to figure it out with me,” she wrote.

Dave Goldberg Was Lifelong Women’s Advocate

Pronovost, who played for the Red Wings, was not a prolific scorer, but he was a consummate team player with bruising checks and fearless bursts up the ice that could puncture a defense.

Marcel Pronovost, 84, Dies; Hall of Famer Shared in Five N.H.L. Titles

Judge Patterson helped to protect the rights of Attica inmates after the prison riot in 1971 and later served on the Federal District Court in Manhattan.

Robert Patterson Jr., Lawyer and Judge Who Fought for the Accused, Dies at 91
paket berangkat umrah awal tahun di Rawamangun jakarta
paket berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Ciracas jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah desember di Rambutan jakarta
biaya umroh mei di Kayu Putih jakarta
biaya paket umroh ramadhan di Cakung jakarta
paket berangkat umroh januari di Pinang Ranti jakarta
paket berangkat umroh ramadhan di Cakung Barat jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah februari bekasi selatan
promo umrah februari di Makasar jakarta
promo berangkat umrah maret di Pal Meriam jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh maret di Kebon Pala jakarta
biaya paket umroh april di Cililitan jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Bali Mester jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh maret di Pondok Kopi jakarta
harga umroh akhir tahun di Pekayon jakarta
harga umroh desember di Duren Sawit jakarta
paket berangkat umroh mei di Ciracas jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh januari di Bali Mester jakarta
paket berangkat umroh desember di Kebon Pala jakarta
promo umroh awal tahun di Kayu Manis jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh april di Kelapa Dua Wetan jakarta
harga berangkat umroh desember di Bidaracina jakarta
biaya paket umroh maret bekasi barat
paket promo berangkat umroh mei di Cipinang Besar Utara jakarta
paket umrah desember di Bali Mester jakarta
harga umroh desember di Cipinang Cempedak jakarta
paket promo umrah januari bogor
promo berangkat umrah ramadhan di Pisangan Timur jakarta
harga paket umrah januari di Jati jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah desember di Pekayon jakarta
paket umrah maret di Cibubur jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh desember di Kampung Tengah jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh januari di Kayu Putih jakarta
paket promo umrah april depok
harga umroh maret di Klender jakarta
biaya paket umrah april di Ciracas jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh juni di Susukan jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh januari di Pondok Kopi jakarta
harga berangkat umrah ramadhan di Cawang jakarta
harga berangkat umroh maret di Rawamangun jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah juni di Balekambang jakarta
biaya umroh juni di Kramat Jati jakarta
harga umroh januari di Pisangan Baru jakarta
harga berangkat umroh april di Makasar jakarta
promo berangkat umroh juni di Pal Meriam jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah april di Cililitan jakarta
harga paket umroh desember di Pisangan Timur jakarta
harga umrah januari di Cakung Barat jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh januari di Rawa Bunga jakarta
harga umrah februari di Halim Perdanakusuma jakarta
paket berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Kalisari jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah maret di Kampung Melayu jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh maret di Pulogebang jakarta
harga umrah januari di Jatinegara jakarta
paket promo umrah ramadhan di Cibubur jakarta
biaya umroh mei di Ceger jakarta
paket umroh april di Pekayon jakarta
promo berangkat umroh awal tahun di Utan Kayu Utara jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah februari di Kampung Melayu jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh ramadhan di Ceger jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah juni di Dukuh jakarta
biaya paket umrah februari bekasi barat
harga paket berangkat umrah desember di Pekayon jakarta
paket berangkat umroh maret di Halim Perdanakusuma jakarta
promo berangkat umroh februari tangerang
paket berangkat umroh april di Kampung Melayu jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah april di Kelapa Dua Wetan jakarta
harga umroh ramadhan di Cilangkap jakarta
paket umroh februari di Kramat Jati jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah januari di Batuampar jakarta
paket promo umroh januari di Pasar Rebo jakarta
harga berangkat umrah mei di Cililitan jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh maret di Pasar Rebo jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah juni di Kayu Putih jakarta
biaya paket umroh april di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
paket berangkat umrah juni bekasi selatan
harga paket berangkat umrah awal tahun di Makasar jakarta
promo berangkat umroh desember di Matraman jakarta
biaya umrah januari depok
biaya umrah maret di Makasar jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah april di Jatinegara Kaum jakarta
paket umroh april di Balekambang jakarta
paket berangkat umrah awal tahun di Ciracas jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh ramadhan di Pisangan Baru jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh awal tahun di Cipayung jakarta
promo berangkat umroh januari umrohdepag.com
biaya umroh akhir tahun di Pinang Ranti jakarta
biaya paket umroh ramadhan di Duren Sawit jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh februari di Kayu Manis jakarta
biaya umroh januari di Dukuh jakarta
promo berangkat umroh mei di Makasar jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh desember di Duren Sawit jakarta
promo umroh awal tahun di Pasar Rebo jakarta
promo berangkat umroh mei di Ceger jakarta
paket berangkat umrah desember di Pulogebang jakarta
biaya umrah maret di Kayu Putih jakarta
paket umrah juni di Susukan jakarta
harga paket umrah mei di Kampung Tengah jakarta
paket promo umrah ramadhan depok
promo berangkat umrah juni di Cipayung jakarta