PAKET UMROH BULAN FEBRUARI MARET APRIL MEI 2017

TRAVEL UMROH RESMI KEMENAG RI

Call / WA: SEPTINA 0821-1420-2323 / Klik disini

 
Lihat Biaya Umroh 2018 Lihat Paket Umroh Desember 2017




Artikel lainnya »

Satuan reserse Polsek Limo, telah berhasil menangkap pencuri di toko Alfamart di Jalan Raya Meruyung, Limo, Kota Depok. Dari empat yang berhasil ditangkap, tiga diantaranya pelajar putus sekolah. Tersangka AS,14, AP,14, SN,20, serta FS,15, telah berhasil ditangkap oleh petugas reserse di bawah pimpinan Kanit Reskrim Polsek Limo, AKP Narta, dari kediamannya tidak jauh dari lokasi pembobolan Alfamart di Meruyung. Kapolsek Limo, Kompol Sujanto juga mengatakan peran masing-masing pelaku yaitu AS dan AP sebagai pencuri toko, sedangkan SN dan FS, sebagai penadah barang curian . “Keempatnya kita tangkap berdasarkan pengembangan kasus laporan pencurian di Toko Alfamart Meruyung. Pelaku satu persatu kita tangkap tidak jauh dari tempat kejadian,”ujarnya kepada Pos Kota di ruang kerjanya. Modus pelaku, masuk ke toko dengan menjebol plafon dan merusak gembok rolling door. “Setelah itu pelaku merusak tralis belakang toko, dan menggasak rokok 400 bungkus, susu sebanyak 40 box, pakaian bola dengan total kerugian mencapai 11 juta,”ungkapnya. Tersangka AS, AP, dan FS juga merupakan pelajar kelas 1 SMA yang tidak lulus sekolah. “Ketiga pelaku ini siswa yang telah dikeluarkan dari sekolahnya. Hasil kejahatannya dijual lalu uangnya digunakan untuk main game serta poya-poya,”paparnya. “Imbauan kami agar pengelola sentra ekonomi menggunakan satpam, pasang cctv, dan karyawan diarahkan keprilaku aman misalnya tutup pintu rapat jika sudah keadaan toko tutup,”harapnya. Untuk dapat mempertanggung jawabkan perbuatannya, AS dan AP dikenakan pasal 363 KUHP atas pencurian pemberatan. Serta kedua rekannya yaitu SN, dan FS dikenakan pasal 480 KUHP tentang penadah hasil curian. “Keempat pelaku terancam kurungan pidana lima tahun penjara,”tegasnya.TIGA REMAJA BOBOL TOKO ALFAMART
 
1- Zakat Mata Uang
Jika harta seseorang senilai 85 gram emas atau 595 gram perak, dengan hitungan nilai pada saat dia mengeluarkan zakat sesuai dengan nilai mata uang negara orang yang membayar zakat, maka dia keluarkan zakatnya sebanyak 2½ %, setelah setiap putaran tahun hijriyah dan harta sampai senisab.
Suatu contoh: Seseorang mempunyai harta seba-nyak Rp.10.000.000,-, setelah satu tahun putaran, maka dia harus mengeluarkan zakat sebagai berikut:
Rp.10.000.000,-
x
25
1000
=
Rp.250.000,-
2- Zakat Utang Piutang
Jika seseorang memberi pinjaman kepada orang lain dan masa pinjaman berlalu beberapa waktu, maka menurut pendapat ulama yang paling mudah*1, orang yang memberi pinjaman harus mengeluarkan zakat piutang dalam jangka setahun saja walaupun hutang tersebut berlalu bertahun-tahun.
Suatu contoh Aiman memberi pinjaman uang ke- pada seseorang yang bernama Ahmad sebanyak Rp. 15.000.000,- dan pinjaman tersebut bertahan pada Ahmad selama tiga tahun, maka siapa yang wajib mengeluarkan zakat dan berapa jumlah zakat yang harus dibayar?
Yang berkewajiban mengeluarkan zakat adalah Aiman karena dia pemilik harta tersebut dan dia wajib mengeluarkan zakat dalam jangka setahun saja sebesar:
Rp.15.000.000,-
x
25
1000
x
1 tahun = Rp.375.000,-
*1 Demikian itu adalah pendapat Imam Malik baik utang yang diharapkan pengembaliannya atau tidak dengan syarat tidak diakhirkan penyerahan-nya tersendiri dari zakat. Jika tidak, maka wajib mengeluarkan zakat tiap tahun yang telah berlalu dari masa hutang. Sebagaimana pendapat Ibnu Qasim Al-Maliki bahwa yang lebih hati-hati adalah mengeluarkan zakat piutang setiap tahun sepanjang masa piutang seperti pendapat madzhab Hambali.
3- Zakat Profesi
Jika seorang muslim memperoleh pendapatan dari hasil usaha atau profesi tertentu, maka dia boleh menge-luarkan zakatnya langsung 2½ % pada saat penerimaan setelah dipotong kebutuhan bulanannya atau menunggu putaran satu tahun dan dikeluarkan zakatnya bersama dengan harta benda lain yang wajib dizakati senilai 2½ %.
Suatu contoh: Seseorang memiliki harta yang diza-kati setiap tahun di awal bulan Muharram, jika dia mene-rima gaji pada bulan Ramadhan, maka dia boleh memilih ketentuan di bawah ini:
Mengeluarkan zakat profesi dari gaji bulan Rama-dhan tersendiri pada bulan itu *2 atau,
Ditunda pembayaran zakat profesi digabung dengan harta yang lain dan dikeluarkan secara bersama pada bulan Muharram.
Secara kaidah bahwa harta itu wajib dizakati sekali dalam setahun.
*2 Termasuk harta profesi antara lain gaji atau pendapatan dari suatu profesi atau keahlian, boleh dikeluarkan zakatnya tanpa menunggu putaran haul (tahun), tetapi tidak boleh dizakati dua kali dalam setahun.
4- Zakat Saham dan Kertas Berharga
Saham dan kertas berharga*3 bila telah sampai seni-sab wajib dikeluarkan zakatnya bersama keuntungannya, seperti nisab mata uang dan kadar zakat sebesar 2½ %.
Suatu contoh: Seseorang memiliki saham, pada saat mau mengeluarkan zakatnya saham tersebut menurut harga pasar senilai Rp.50.000.000,- dan tiap tahun mendapat-kan laba sebesar Rp.5.000.000,- sehingga jumlah harta keseluruhan sebesar Rp.50.000.000,- + Rp.5.000.000,- = Rp.55.000.000,-.
Zakatnya: Rp.55.000.000,-
x
25
1000
=
Rp.1.375.000,-
*3 Kertas berharga biasanya tercampur dengan nilai yang haram yaitu riba, tetap wajib dikeluarkan zakatnya, karena dibolehkan menyalurkan hasil yang haram untuk kepentingan umum kaum muslimin
5- Zakat Perhiasan Wanita
Pendapat tengah-tengah di antara pendapat para ulama adalah pendapat yang diriwayatkan dari Anas bin Malik radhiallaahu anhu bahwa beliau berfatwa tentang wajibnya zakat perhiasan sekali dalam seumur dan bukan setiap putaran haul (tahun)*4 , tetapi jika membeli perhiasan lain maka dia harus mengeluarkan zakat perhiasan yang baru dibeli itu dengan syarat barang tersebut hanya untuk perhiasan*5. Adapun peralatan dan wadah yang terbuat dari emas bila telah sampai senisab, maka harus dikeluarkan zakatnya.
Suatu contoh: Seorang wanita memiliki perhiasan emas seberat 100 gram yang dipakai untuk perhiasan, bagaimana mengeluarkan zakatnya?
Jawab: Wajib bagi wanita mengeluarkan zakat per-hiasan tersebut sekali dalam seumur.
100 x 2½
=
25
100
gr. atau berupa uang senilai 2½ gr.
Jika dia membeli lagi emas untuk perhiasan sebe-rat 100 gram, maka dia harus mengeluarkan zakatnya sebesar 2½ gram sekali saja seumur hidup.
*4 Pendapat ini terdapat dalam kitab Al-Muhalla 6/78 dan Sunan Kubra 4/ 138
*5 Kadar zakat yang wajib dikeluarkan baik emas maupun perak sebesar 2½ %.
6- Zakat Apartemen, Perkantoran dan Tanah Persewaan
(A). Barangsiapa yang memiliki apartemen, ruko atau tanah yang disewakan, maka dia wajib mengeluar-kan zakat dari hasil penyewaan sebesar 2½ %, bila telah sampai senisab.
Suatu contoh: Seseorang memiliki ruko untuk disewakan tahunan dengan nilai sewa sebesar Rp.20.000.000,- bagaimana cara mengeluarkan zakatnya?
Jawab: Kadar zakatnya 2½%
Rp.20.000.000,-
x
25
1000
=
Rp.500.000,-
Catatan: Jika gedung tersebut belum ada yang menyewa maka belum ada kewajiban mengeluarkan zakat.
(B). Jika seseorang menjual gedung tersebut, ma-ka dia wajib mengeluarkan zakat dari hasil penjualan sebesar 2½ %.
Suatu contoh: Seseorang memiliki tanah kosong kemudian dijual dan laku seharga Rp.100.000.000,- dan se-belum terjual tanah tersebut berada di bawah kepemilikan-nya selama tiga tahun tanpa mendapatkan keuntungan karena tidak ada yang menyewa. Maka dia wajib menge-luarkan zakat dari hasil penjualan saja dengan perincian:
Rp.100.000.000,-
x
25
1000
=
Rp.2.500.000,-
Dan dikeluarkan cukup setahun itu saja sesuai de-ngan pendapat yang paling mudah.*6
Kaidah: Jika gedung atau tanah tersebut diguna-kan untuk keperluan pribadi tidak wajib dizakati.
*6 Demikian itu adalah pendapat dari madzhab Malikiyah, alasan mereka bahwa harta persewaan sebelum terjual tidak berkembang sehingga tidak harus dizakati. Lihat Syarh Kabir dan Hasyiyah Dasuqi 1/457. Dan untuk lebih hati-hati sebaiknya mengeluarkan zakatnya setiap tahun bila jelas tanah tersebut d iproyeksikan untuk niaga.
7- Zakat Perdagangan
Seorang pedagang hendaknya menghitung jumlah nilai barang dagangan dengan harga asli lalu digabung-kan dengan keuntungan bersih setelah dipotong piutang. Kadar zakatnya 2½ %.*7
Suatu contoh: Seorang pedagang menjumlah barang dagangan di akhir tahun dengan jumlah total Rp. 200.000.000,- dan laba bersih sebesar Rp.50.000.000,- sementara dia mempunyai hutang sebesar Rp.100.000.000,-.
Modal dikurangi hutang: Rp.200.000.000,- – Rp. 100.000.000,- = Rp.100.000.000,-
Jumlah harta zakat: Rp.100.000.000,- + Rp. 50.000.000,- = Rp.150.000.000,-
Zakatnya: Rp.150.000.000,-
x
25
1000
=
Rp.3.750.000,-
*7 Modal tetap tidak wajib dizakati seperti gedung, perkakas dan alat opera-sional perdagangan
8- Zakat Tanaman
Jika biji-bijian atau buah-buahan*8 telah sampai senisab yaitu lima wasak atau seberat + 670 kg, maka wajib dikeluarkan zakatnya 10% bila disiram dengan air hujan dan 5% jika menggunakan alat atau memindah air dari tempat lain dengan kendaraan atau yang lainnya.
Suatu contoh: Seorang petani memetik hasil panen sebanyak lima ton gandum dan dua ton korma, maka berapa zakat yang harus dikeluarkan jika dia mengguna-kan alat penyiram tanaman?
Zakat gandum: 5000
x
5
100
=
250 kg.
Zakat korma: 2000
x
5
100
=
100 kg.
*8 Hasil-hasil pertanian selain biji-bijian dianggap sebagai buah-buahan, seperti sayur mayur segar dan buahan-buahan masih dalam kelompok barang-barang niaga yang kadar zakatnya 2½ %. Meskipun Madzhab Hanafi berpendapat wajib mengeluarkan zakat setiap tanaman yang ditumbuhkan bumi sekadar 5% atau 10% sebagaimana penjelasan yang telah lalu.
9- Zakat Peternakan
Jika seseorang memiliki lima onta, maka ia wajib mengeluarkan zakat seekor kambing dan jika memiliki tiga puluh sapi, maka dia harus mengeluarkan tabi’i (sapi yang berumur setahun). Jika memiliki kambing empat puluh, maka dia wajib mengeluarkan zakat seekor kambing. Apabila jumlah hewan ternak lebih dari hitung-an di atas, maka cara mengeluarkan zakat seperti pada tabel di bawah ini:
Selain hewan yang tersebut di atas masuk dalam kelompok barang niaga bila diproyeksikan sebagai barang perdagangan.
Tabel Zakat Hewan Ternak yang Hidup di Padang Gembala
Tabel Zakat Kambing
Nisab
Zakat yang harus dikeluarkan
Dari
Sampai
40
120
1 Kambing
121
200
2 Kambing
201
 
3 Kambing
Kemudian setiap 100 kambing zakatnya seekor kambing
* Tidak boleh mengambil zakat berupa pejantan, hewan yang sudah tua sekali, cacat atau paling buruk.
* Tidak boleh mengambil zakat berupa hewan pincang, hewan betina yang mau melahirkan, hewan potong atau hewan termahal.
Tabel Zakat Onta
Nisab
Zakat yang harus dikeluarkan
Dari
Sampai
5
9
1 Kambing
10
14
2 Kambing
15
19
3 Kambing
20
24
4 Kambing
25
35
1 Bintu Makhadh
36
45
1 Bintu labun
46
60
1 Hiqqah
61
75
1 Jad’ah
76
90
2 Bintu Labun
91
120
2 Hiqqah
121
 
3 Bintu Labun
Kemudian setiap 40 onta zakatnya satu Bintu Labun dan setiap 50 onta zakatnya 1 Hiqqah.
Bintu Makhadh adalah onta yang telah berumur satu tahun, dinamakan seperti itu karena induknya sedang hamil.
Bintu Labun adalah onta yang telah berumur dua tahun, dinamakan seperti itu karena induknya sedang menyusui lagi.
Hiqqah adalah onta yang telah berumur tiga tahun, dinamakan seperti itu karena sudah mampu dan berhak dikendarai.
Jad’ah adalah onta telah yang berumur empat tahun
Tabel Zakat Sapi
Nisab
Zakat yang harus dibayarkan
Dari
Sampai
30
39
1 Tabii’ atau Tabii’ah
40
59
1 Musinnah
60
 
2 Tabii’ah
Kemudian setiap tiga puluh sapi zakatnya satu tabii’i dan setiap empat puluh sapi satu Musinnah.
* Tabii’ atau Tabii’ah adalah sapi yang telah berumur satu tahun.
* Musinnah adalah sapi yang telah berumur dua tahun.
10- Zakat Madu Tawon
Jika hasil madu mencapai nisab seberat 670 kg, maka harus dikeluarkan zakatnya sebesar 10 % dari be-rat bersih madu setelah dipotong biaya produksi.
Suatu contoh: Zakat 1000 kg madu adalah:
1000 kg
x
10
100
=
100 kg.
11- Zakat Barang Tambang
Hasil tambang dan minyak serta gas bumi hasilnya harus disalurkan ke Baitul Mal untuk kepentingan umum dan kebutuhan ummat.
Jika ada seseorang atau perusahaan diberi kesem-patan menambang dan mengolah barang tambang terse-but, maka dia harus mengeluarkan zakat sebesar 2½ % dari penghasilan yang telah dikelola. Termasuk kelom-pok barang tambang yaitu seluruh bahan bangunan seperti batu atau pasir, juga harus dikeluarkan zakatnya sebesar 2½ % dari hasil yang telah diperoleh.*9
*9 Zakat hasil tambang tidak disyaratkan putaran haul (tahun), wajib menge-luarkan zakat pada saat barang tambang telah selesai proses pengolahan.
12- Zakat Hasil Laut dan Perikanan
Jika seorang nelayan atau perusahaan pengolah hasil laut menangkap ikan kemudian hasil tersebut dijual, maka dia wajib mengeluarkan zakat seperti zakat niaga yaitu 2½% (*10) demikian itu bila hasilnya telah sampai senisab seperti nisabnya mata uang.
Suatu contoh: Suatu perusahaan penangkap ikan menghasilkan satu ton ikan, kemudian dijual kepada konsumen seharga Rp.4.000.00,-, berapa zakat yang harus dibayar.*11
Zakatnya: Rp.4.000.000,-
x
25
1000
=
Rp.100.000,-
*10 Pendapat ini diriwayatkan dari Imam Ahmad seperti yang telah disebut-kan dalam kitab Al-Mughni 3/28.
*11 Artinya nilai jual ikan seharga nisabnya mata uang yaitu 85 gr emas
13- Zakat Fitrah
A. Setiap muslim wajib membayar zakat fitrah setelah matahari terbenam akhir bulan Ramadhan dan lebih utama jika dibayarkan sebelum keluar shalat Idul Fitri dan boleh dibayarkan dua hari sebelum hari raya *12 , demi menjaga kemaslahatan orang fakir. Dan haram mengakhirkan pembayaran zakat fitrah hingga habis shalat dan barangsiapa melakukan perbuatan tersebut, maka harus menggantinya.*13
B. Seorang muslim wajib membayar zakat untuk dirinya dan orang-orang yang menjadi tanggung jawab-nya seperti isterinya, anaknya, dan pembantunya yang muslim. Akan tetapi boleh bagi seorang isteri atau anak atau pembantu membayar zakat sendiri.
C. Kadar zakat fitrah yang harus dibayar*14 adalah satu sha’ dari makanan pokok negara setempat, dan satu sha’ untuk ukuran sekarang kira-kira 2,176 kg (keten-tuan ini sesuai makanan pokok gandum).
Dan kita bisa menggunakan tangan untuk menjadi takaran dengan cara kita penuhi kedua telapak tangan sebanyak empat kali. Karena satu mud sama dengan genggaman dua telapak tangan orang dewasa dan satu sha’ sama dengan empat mud.
Contoh: Seseorang mempunyai satu isteri dan empat orang anak serta satu pembantu muslim, berapa dia harus membayar zakat fitrah untuk mereka?
Dengan ukuran sha’ dia harus membayar 7 x 1 sha’ = 7 sha’
Dengan takaran atau timbangan sekarang berupa gandum: 7 x 2,176 kg = 15,232 kg atau lima belas kilo dua ratus tiga puluh dua gram.
Dan dengan kita meraup gandum dengan dua tela-pak tangan: 7 x 4 = 28 kali raupan dari makanan pokok baik berupa korma, gandum, anggur kering, susu ke-ring, jagung atau beras.
D. Dianjurkan mengeluarkan zakat dengan makanan*15 , Imam Abu Hanifah membolehkan membayar dengan uang dan ini pendapat yang lebih mudah terlebih bagi lingkungan industri.*16
Kadar nilai zakat disesuaikan dengan harga makan-an pokok masing-masing negara, jika seseorang ingin membayar zakat dengan korma sebanyak dua puluh kilo, maka hendaknya dia harus menanyakan harga kor-ma per kilo untuk ukuran korma sedang, lalu dihitung dengan mata uang setempat.
*12 Menurut madzhab Hambali boleh mengeluarkan zakat setelah pertengah-an bulan Ramadhan, pendapat ini lebih mempermudah khususnya bagi negara yang menangani langsung pembayaran zakat fitrah, atau jika yang menangani itu yayasan-yayasan sosial, sehingga mempermudah mereka dalam pengumpulan dan pembagiannya pada hari Ied.
*13 Lihat Nailul Authar, 4/195. Fiqhuz Zakah: 1/155.
*14 Dalam zakat fitrah tidak mengenal nisab, di saat ada kelebihan dari kebutuhan makanan pada malam hari raya untuk dirinya dan keluarga-nya, maka seseorang wajib membayar zakat fitrah.
*15 Para ulama madzhab tiga (Imam Malik, Syafi’i dan Ahmad) tidak membo-lehkan mengeluarkan zakat fitrah dengan uang.
*16 Fiqhuz Zakah , 1/949. Penulis pernah membuat semacam ide yang disampaikan lewat mimbar pada tahun 1404 H. hendaknya zakat fitrah dikelola oleh pemerintah atau Lembaga Islam kemudian disalurkan kepada yang berhak dan yang membutuhkan baik di dalam maupun luar negeri khususnya negara-negara yang terkena krisis seperti negara Afrika atau Asia yang banyak menderita kelaparan. Apalagi kristenisasi sangat gencar dengan berkedok bantuan sosial berupa makanan atau obat-obatan untuk bantuan kelaparan dan bencana alam dimanfaatkan untuk pemurtadan sehingga banyak di antara kaum muslimin yang keluar dari Islam hanya karena sesuap nasi seperti yang terjadi di Indonesia.
Jika zakat fitrah tersebut bisa dikumpulkan setelah pertengahan bulan Ramadhan, maka sangat mungkin zakat fitrah tersebut disalurkan kepada yang berhak pada waktu itu juga. Dengan demikian pada saat hari raya orang-orang kelaparan bisa merasa kenyang dan kecukupan, bila tidak apa mungkin seseorang dipaksa bergembira di hari raya sementara kela-paran melilitnya.
 
 
PERHITUNGAN ZAKAT MENURUT ISLAM

Nikmati khasiat air panas di kolam pemandian Sariater (Ciater), yang sudah terkenal ke seluruh pelosok Jawa Barat. Tempat favorit untuk bersantai bersama keluarga ini juga merupakan a must visit place bagi siapa pun yang berkunjung ke Kabupaten Subang.
Uniknya, mata air panas Ciater telah berasal dari kawah aktif Gunung Tangkuban Parahu yang letaknya juga tidak terlalu jauh dari objek wisata ini. Selain dialirkan ke pemandian, air panas tersebut mengalir melalui sungai sepanjang 2.000 m yang kemudian telah menjadi dingin dan digunakan untuk kepentingan pengairan lahan persawahan. Konon menurut petani setempat, air ini lebih dapat untuk mempengaruhi mutu panen dibanding air biasa.  
Objek wisata Ciater akan terasa semakin memesona dengan suguhan udara pegunungan yang dingin serta pemandangan perkebunan teh yang luas. Selain suasana setempat yang nyaman,  Anda juga dapat memanfaatkan air di tempat ini untuk terapi kesehatan. Konon kandungan belerangnya ideal untuk dapat menyembuhkan berbagai penyakit seperti kelumpuhan, rematik, gangguan syaraf, tulang, dan berbagai penyakit kulit lainnya bila dilakukan secara teratur.
Objek wisata alam dengan suguhan udara pegunungan yang dingin serta pemandangan perkebunan teh yang luas, semakin menambah nilai pengalaman yang dalam ketika wisatawan berkunjung ke daerah ini.
 

 

TEMPAT WISATA PEMANDIAN AIR PANAS CIATER

Jasa Pembuatran Website Dan SEO

 
Jasa SEO
adalah proses optimasi sebuah situs web agar dapat menempati peringkat tertinggi pada hasil pencarian search engine.

Semakin tinggi peringkat sebuah situs web pada hasil pencarian search engine, semakin tinggi jumlah pengunjung yang datang dan itu berarti semakin besar peluang untuk terjadinya penjualan pada situs web tersebut. 85% pengguna search engine mengklik dari hasil hasil pencarian organic. Untuk itu situs web Anda harus berada pada posisi 20 teratas, dan sebaiknya di posisi 10 teratas pada hasil pencarian search engine. Perlu diketahui bahwa sekitar 90% dari pengguna tidak melanjutkan lebih dari halaman ke-2 pada hasil pencarian search engine.
 

1. OPTIMIZATION AUDIT
Jasa SEO Bergaransi
Untuk memulai, kami melakukan audit pada situs web Anda untuk mengidentifikasi hal-hal yang membutuhkan perbaikan dalam optimasi situs web anda. Hal ini untuk memfokuskan pada strategi yang sesuai, dan memastikan situs web Anda teroptimasi secara maksimal dari strategi jasa SEO kami.
2. COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
Jasa SEO Jakarta
Sejalan dengan audit optimasi, jasa SEO kami juga melakukan analisa kompetisi untuk mengevaluasi peringkat situs web Anda yang berkaitan secara langsung dengan pesaing Anda, dan perencanaan perbaikan untuk mendapatkan peringkat lebih baik dari pesaing Anda.
3. KEYWORD ANALYSIS
Jasa SEO Terbaik
Selanjutnya, kami menggunakan sejumlah alat analisa untuk mengidentifikasi target kata kunci yang akan digunakan untuk mendatangkan kunjungan oleh pengunjung yang ditargetkan ke situs web Anda. Kami mencari target kata kunci dengan jumlah pencarian yang tinggi dengan tingkat persaingan yang rendah.
Jasa SEO Google
Kami memeriksa struktur dan kode situs web anda, dan merevisi jika diperlukan untuk memperbaiki adanya kesalahan yang menghambat mesin pencari mengindeks situs web anda. Kami akan mengoptimalkan struktur situs web anda, struktur link, dan struktur sitemap untuk meningkatkan 'deep linking' yang akan menghasilkan pengindeksan konten yang lebih teratur oleh spider mesin pencari.
5. USABILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Jasa SEO Search Engine
Sebuah situs web yang dioptimalkan untuk mesin pencari hanya berharga apabila Anda dapat mengkonversi kunjungan menjadi pelanggan atau pengunjung melakukan sesuatu sesuai dengan tujuan dari situs web anda. Ini sebabnya kami mengevaluasi keseluruhan fungsi dan kegunaan situs web, dan memperbaikinya agar memudahkan pengguna dalam bernavigasi pada situs web Anda.
6. CONTENT STRATEGY
Jasa SEO Keywords
Dengan menggunakan data dari analisa kata kunci (keyword), kami mengoptimalkan konten secara on-page pada halaman situs sehingga target kata kunci terletak di daerah konten yang paling efektif. Kami bekerja sama dengan Anda untuk mengembangkan strategi pembuatan konten karena faktor utama optimasi adalah konten yang friendly bagi mesin pencari sekaligus mampu menarik perhatian pengunjung situs.
7. BLOG CREATION
Jasa SEO Blog
Mesin pencari akan melakukan pengindeksan secara lebih teratur apabila sebuah situs web secara aktif melakukan pembaruan dalam konten.
Mesin pencari dapat meningkatkan posisi situs web pada peringkat yang lebih tinggi secara berkala. Ini sebabnya kami merekomendasikan bahwa semua klien kami memiliki sebuah blog pada situs mereka.
Kami dapat membantu anda membuat, mengelola, dan secara berkala mengupdate blog perusahaan secara profesional dengan konten yang menarik.
8. LINK BUILDING
Jasa SEO Link
Link Building adalah bagian terpenting dari optimasi mesin pencari.
Mesin pencari seperti Google menganggap incoming link yang mengarah ke situs web Anda sebagai bentuk 'referensi' oleh situs lain. Semakin banyak situs web Anda mendapatkan 'referensi' dari situs lain, search engine menganggap situs Anda penting dan mempunyai otoritas. Jasa SEO kami memfokuskan pada incoming link dari situs-situs yang berkualitas, relevan, dan mempunyai otoritas pada industri yang berkaitan.
9. REAL-TIME MONITORING
Jasa SEO Monitoring
Jasa SEO kami menggunakan Google Analytics untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas proses optimasi, dan untuk menganalisa hasil konversi dari sasaran yang ditetapkan.
10. CONVERSION OPTIMIZATION
Jasa SEO Optimasi

Kami menganalisa dan memperbaiki bagaimana situs web Anda dapat mengkonversi kunjungan oleh pengunjung menjadi pelanggan Anda.

 

1
CONSULTATION
Kami akan berkonsultasi dengan Anda untuk mengetahui tujuan dari situs web perusahaan secara keseluruhan dan produk utama yang ditawarkan. Selanjutnya jasa SEO kami akan melakukan audit optimasi situs web Anda untuk mengidentifikasi teknik-teknik khusus yang dapat diterapkan untuk meningkatkan peringkat situs web Anda.
2
IMPLEMENTATION
Jasa SEO kami memperbaiki faktor on-site situs web Anda seperti struktur situs web, title, kode HTML, dan kepadatan kata kunci (keyword density). Kami juga mengoptimasi faktor off-site situs web dengan mencantumkan situs web Anda pada beberapa direktori bisnis terkemuka, dan membangun incoming link yang berkualitas dari situs-situs yang mempunyai otoritas dengan peringkat tinggi dan berkaitan dengan bisnis Anda.
3
MONITORING AND REPORTING

Setelah implementasi, jasa SEO kami terus memonitor peringkat situs web Anda untuk beberapa target kata kunci yang mendatangkan banyak kunjungan. Kami akan mengirimkan kepada Anda detail laporan bulanan tentang kinerja dan performa dari kampanye optimasi mesin pencari yang kita lakukan.

4
CONTINUOUS ADJUSMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS
Kami mengevaluasi efektivitas optimasi yang sedang berlangsung dalam upaya peningkatan jumlah kunjungan dan penjualan pada situs web Anda. Pada tahap ini, Anda dapat melihat potensi optimasi mesin pencari. Kita akan bekerja sama kembali untuk memperbaiki lebih lanjut tentang target kata kunci, dan strategi konten yang akan menjadikan situs web Anda meduduki peringkat yang lebih baik lagi.
JASA PEMBUATRAN WEBSITE DAN SEO

saco-indonesia.com, Kawanan perampok di Kantor Bank BRI Cab. Pembantu Panongan, Kabupaten Tangerang Selasa (24/12) sore telah berhasil membawa kabur uang sebesar Rp500 juta.

Informasi yang telah dikumpulkan di lokasi kejadian tersebut, para perampok yang telah diketahui berjumlah 5 orang bersenjatakan pistol jenis FN dan senjata tajam datang ke lokasi kejadian dengan menggunakan tiga sepeda motor bebek.

Setibanya di Bank BRI Cab Pembantu yang beralamat di Jalan Korelet raya, Kelurahan Ranca Kelapa, Kec. Panongan, Kabupaten Tangerang, dua orang pelaku telah membawa senpi dan sajam langsung masuk ke dalam bank. Sedangkan sisanya menunggu halaman parkir.

“Dua pelaku tersebut masuk ke dalam bank. Sedangkan tiga lainnya tetap berjaga di luar,” ungkap Kapolres Kombes Irfing Jaya Sik.

Di dalam bank, jelas Kapolres, para pelaku kemudian mengikat dan menyekap 5 orang yang saat itu berada di dalam bank. Para korban telah diketahui sebagai Kepala Unit Bank BRI Cab. Panongan, teller, office boy dan dua orang nasabah yang saat itu berada di dalam.

“Pelaku juga sempat memukul kepala petugas teller (kasir) bank hingga terluka,” papar Irfing Jaya.

Usai mengacak-acak seluruh ruangan bank, dan mengambil uang sebesar Rp 500 juta. Pelaku kemudian telah melarikan diri dengan menggunakan sepeda motor.

“Uang yang dibawa kabur sebesar Rp 500 juta,” ungkap Kasat Reskrim Polresta Tangerang, Kompol Siswo Yuwono.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

UANG RP 500 JUTA BANK BRI DIGASAK OLEH RAMPOK

WASHINGTON — The last three men to win the Republican nomination have been the prosperous son of a president (George W. Bush), a senator who could not recall how many homes his family owned (John McCain of Arizona; it was seven) and a private equity executive worth an estimated $200 million (Mitt Romney).

The candidates hoping to be the party’s nominee in 2016 are trying to create a very different set of associations. On Sunday, Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, joined the presidential field.

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida praises his parents, a bartender and a Kmart stock clerk, as he urges audiences not to forget “the workers in our hotel kitchens, the landscaping crews in our neighborhoods, the late-night janitorial staff that clean our offices.”

Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, a preacher’s son, posts on Twitter about his ham-and-cheese sandwiches and boasts of his coupon-clipping frugality. His $1 Kohl’s sweater has become a campaign celebrity in its own right.

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky laments the existence of “two Americas,” borrowing the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s phrase to describe economically and racially troubled communities like Ferguson, Mo., and Detroit.

Photo
 
Senator Marco Rubio of Florida praises his parents, a bartender and a Kmart stock clerk. Credit Joe Raedle/Getty Images

“Some say, ‘But Democrats care more about the poor,’ ” Mr. Paul likes to say. “If that’s true, why is black unemployment still twice white unemployment? Why has household income declined by $3,500 over the past six years?”

We are in the midst of the Empathy Primary — the rhetorical battleground shaping the Republican presidential field of 2016.

Harmed by the perception that they favor the wealthy at the expense of middle-of-the-road Americans, the party’s contenders are each trying their hardest to get across what the elder George Bush once inelegantly told recession-battered voters in 1992: “Message: I care.”

Their ability to do so — less bluntly, more sincerely — could prove decisive in an election year when power, privilege and family connections will loom large for both parties.

Advertisement

Questions of understanding and compassion cost Republicans in the last election. Mr. Romney, who memorably dismissed the “47 percent” of Americans as freeloaders, lost to President Obama by 63 percentage points among voters who cast their ballots for the candidate who “cares about people like me,” according to exit polls.

And a Pew poll from February showed that people still believe Republicans are indifferent to working Americans: 54 percent said the Republican Party does not care about the middle class.

That taint of callousness explains why Senator Ted Cruz of Texas declared last week that Republicans “are and should be the party of the 47 percent” — and why another son of a president, Jeb Bush, has made economic opportunity the centerpiece of his message.

With his pedigree and considerable wealth — since he left the Florida governor’s office almost a decade ago he has earned millions of dollars sitting on corporate boards and advising banks — Mr. Bush probably has the most complicated task making the argument to voters that he understands their concerns.

On a visit last week to Puerto Rico, Mr. Bush sounded every bit the populist, railing against “elites” who have stifled economic growth and innovation. In the kind of economy he envisions leading, he said: “We wouldn’t have the middle being squeezed. People in poverty would have a chance to rise up. And the social strains that exist — because the haves and have-nots is the big debate in our country today — would subside.”

Continue reading the main story
 

Who Is Running for President (and Who’s Not)?

Republicans’ emphasis on poorer and working-class Americans now represents a shift from the party’s longstanding focus on business owners and “job creators” as the drivers of economic opportunity.

This is intentional, Republican operatives said.

In the last presidential election, Republicans rushed to defend business owners against what they saw as hostility by Democrats to successful, wealthy entrepreneurs.

“Part of what you had was a reaction to the Democrats’ dehumanization of business owners: ‘Oh, you think you started your plumbing company? No you didn’t,’ ” said Grover Norquist, the conservative activist and president of Americans for Tax Reform.

But now, Mr. Norquist said, Republicans should move past that. “Focus on the people in the room who know someone who couldn’t get a job, or a promotion, or a raise because taxes are too high or regulations eat up companies’ time,” he said. “The rich guy can take care of himself.”

Democrats argue that the public will ultimately see through such an approach because Republican positions like opposing a minimum-wage increase and giving private banks a larger role in student loans would hurt working Americans.

“If Republican candidates are just repeating the same tired policies, I’m not sure that smiling while saying it is going to be enough,” said Guy Cecil, a Democratic strategist who is joining a “super PAC” working on behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Republicans have already attacked Mrs. Clinton over the wealth and power she and her husband have accumulated, caricaturing her as an out-of-touch multimillionaire who earns hundreds of thousands of dollars per speech and has not driven a car since 1996.

Mr. Walker hit this theme recently on Fox News, pointing to Mrs. Clinton’s lucrative book deals and her multiple residences. “This is not someone who is connected with everyday Americans,” he said. His own net worth, according to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, is less than a half-million dollars; Mr. Walker also owes tens of thousands of dollars on his credit cards.

Continue reading the main story

But showing off a cheap sweater or boasting of a bootstraps family background not only helps draw a contrast with Mrs. Clinton’s latter-day affluence, it is also an implicit argument against Mr. Bush.

Mr. Walker, who featured a 1998 Saturn with more than 100,000 miles on the odometer in a 2010 campaign ad during his first run for governor, likes to talk about flipping burgers at McDonald’s as a young person. His mother, he has said, grew up on a farm with no indoor plumbing until she was in high school.

Mr. Rubio, among the least wealthy members of the Senate, with an estimated net worth of around a half-million dollars, uses his working-class upbringing as evidence of the “exceptionalism” of America, “where even the son of a bartender and a maid can have the same dreams and the same future as those who come from power and privilege.”

Mr. Cruz alludes to his family’s dysfunction — his parents, he says, were heavy drinkers — and recounts his father’s tale of fleeing Cuba with $100 sewn into his underwear.

Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey notes that his father paid his way through college working nights at an ice cream plant.

But sometimes the attempts at projecting authenticity can seem forced. Mr. Christie recently found himself on the defensive after telling a New Hampshire audience, “I don’t consider myself a wealthy man.” Tax returns showed that he and his wife, a longtime Wall Street executive, earned nearly $700,000 in 2013.

The story of success against the odds is a political classic, even if it is one the Republican Party has not been able to tell for a long time. Ronald Reagan liked to say that while he had not been born on the wrong side of the tracks, he could always hear the whistle. Richard Nixon was fond of reminding voters how he was born in a house his father had built.

“Probably the idea that is most attractive to an average voter, and an idea that both Republicans and Democrats try to craft into their messages, is this idea that you can rise from nothing,” said Charles C. W. Cooke, a writer for National Review.

There is a certain delight Republicans take in turning that message to their advantage now.

“That’s what Obama did with Hillary,” Mr. Cooke said. “He acknowledged it openly: ‘This is ridiculous. Look at me, this one-term senator with dark skin and all of America’s unsolved racial problems, running against the wife of the last Democratic president.”

G.O.P. Hopefuls Now Aiming to Woo the Middle Class

ate in February, Dr. Ben Carson, the celebrated pediatric neurosurgeon turned political insurrectionist, was trying to check off another box on his presidential-campaign to-do list: hiring a press secretary. The lead prospect, a public-relations specialist named Deana Bass, had come to meet him at the dimly lit Capitol Hill office of Carson’s confidant and business manager, Armstrong Williams. Carson sat back and scrutinized her from behind a small granite table, as life-size cardboard cutouts of more conventional politicians — President Obama, with a tight smile, and Senator John McCain, glowering — loomed behind each of his shoulders. (The mock $3 bill someone had left on a table in Williams’s waiting room undercut any notion that this was a bipartisan zone; it featured Obama wearing a turban.)

Bass seemed momentarily speechless, and not just because no one had warned her that a New York Times reporter would be sitting in on her job interview. Though she knew Williams — a jack-of-all-trades entrepreneur who owns several television stations and a public-affairs business and who hosts a daily talk-radio show — through Washington’s small circle of black conservatives, the two hadn’t spoken in years until he called her two days earlier. He had been struggling to come up with the perfect national spokesperson, he told her. Then, at the gym, her name popped into his head; Williams was fairly certain she was the one. Sitting across from a likely candidate for president, Bass was adjusting to the idea that her life might be about to take a sudden chaotic turn.

“It’s like getting the most random call on a Monday that you simply do not see coming,” she said. “Oftentimes, that is how the Lord works.”

Continue reading the main story

His life in brain surgery
has prepared him for the
presidency, he maintains,
better than lives in
politics have for his rivals.

Carson concurred: “It’s always how he works in my life.” Carson is soft-spoken and often talks with his eyes half closed, frequently punctuating his sentences with a small laugh, even if the humor of his statement is not readily apparent. Bass told Carson that she had been a Republican staff member on Capitol Hill then worked for the Republican National Committee. In 2007 she started a Christian public-relations firm with her sister. She enjoyed working on the Hill, she said, but the pay wasn’t as high as the hours were long. “We figured that we worked like slaves for other people, and we wanted to work for ourselves.”

Carson stopped her. “You know you can’t mention that word, right?” Carson waited a beat, then laughed, and Williams and Bass joined in. He was getting to the point; he needed a professional who could help him check his penchant for creating uncontrolled controversy just by talking.

The Ben Carson movement began in 2013, when Carson, a neurosurgeon, whose operating-room prowess and up-from-poverty back story had made him the subject of a television movie and a regular on the inspirational-speaking circuit, was invited to address the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington. With Barack Obama sitting just two seats away, Carson warned that “moral decay” and “fiscal irresponsibility” could destroy America just as it did ancient Rome. He proposed a substitute for Obamacare — Health Savings Accounts, which, he said, would end any talk of “death panels” — and a flat-tax based on the concept of tithing. His address, combined with the president’s stony reaction, was a smash with Republican activists. Speaking and interview requests flooded in. Carson, then 61, announced his planned retirement a few weeks later, freeing his calendar to accept just about all of them. In the months that followed, his rhetoric became increasingly strident. The claim that drew the most attention, perhaps, was that Obamacare was “the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.”

Bass’s own use of the word prompted Carson to ask her what she thought about that incident. She considered for a moment.

“If you want to reach people and have them even understand what you’re saying, there is a way to do it, without that hyperbole, that might be. . . . ” She paused. “I just think it’s important not to shut people off before they —”

Carson jumped in. “That doesn’t allow them to hear what you’re saying?”

Bass nodded.

Likening Obamacare to slavery — and slavery was incomparably worse, Carson said — had its political advantages for a candidacy like his. It was the kind of statement that stoked the angriest of the Republican voters: conservative stalwarts who can’t hear enough bad things about Obama. This, in turn, led to more talk-radio and Fox News appearances, more book sales, more donations to the super PAC started in his name, more support in the polls. (The day before the meeting, one poll of Republican voters showed Carson statistically tied for first place with Jeb Bush and Scott Walker.)

Rhetorical excess was good for business, but Carson now wants to be seen as more than a novelty candidate. He has come to learn that such extreme analogies, while true to his views, aren’t especially presidential. They alienate more moderate voters and, perhaps even more damaging, reinforce the impression that he is not “serious” — that he is another Herman Cain, the black former Godfather’s Pizza chief executive who rose to the top of the early presidential polls in 2011 but then bowed out before the Iowa caucuses, largely because of leaked allegations of sexual misconduct, which he denied but from which he never recovered. Cain lingers as a cautionary tale for the party as much as for a right-leaning candidate like Carson. The fact that Cain, with his folksy sayings (“shucky ducky”) and misnomers (“Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan”), reached the top of the national polls — much less that he was eventually followed there by the likes of Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, who all topped one or another poll in the 2012 primary season — wound up being a considerable embarrassment for the eventual nominee, Mitt Romney, and for the longtime party regulars who were trying to fast-track his way to the nomination.

Carson liked Bass and, without directly saying so, made it clear the job was hers for the taking. Carson’s campaign chairman, Terry Giles — a white lawyer whose clients have included the comedian Richard Pryor and the stepson of the model Anna Nicole Smith and who helped reconcile the business interests of the descendants of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. — had assembled a mostly white campaign team, including many from the 2012 Gingrich effort, and Carson wanted a person of color to speak for him. Bass said she would have to mull it over, pray about it. Carson nodded approvingly. “Pray about it,” he said. “See what you think.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Williams knew the party was intent on protecting the eventual 2016 nominee from the same embarrassment Romney suffered. Already, suspiciously tough articles about Carson were showing up in conservative magazines and on right-wing websites. “They’re protecting these establishment candidates,” Williams said. “This is coming from within the house. This is family.” At the very least, he wanted to make sure that Carson didn’t do their work for them. (Carson would commit another unforced error a week later, when he told CNN that homosexuality was clearly a choice, because a lot of people go in prison straight and “when they come out, they’re gay”; he later apologized.)

“We need somebody to protect him, sometimes, from himself,” he told Bass — laughing, but only half kidding.

A candidacy like Carson’s presents a new kind of problem to the establishment wing of the G.O.P., which, at least since 1980, has selected its presidential nominees with a routine efficiency that Democrats could only envy. The establishment candidate has usually been a current or former governor or senator, blandly Protestant, hailing from the moderate, big-business wing of the party (or at least friendly with it) and almost always a second-, third- or fourth-time national contender — someone who had waited “his turn.” These candidates would tack predictably to the right during the primaries to satisfy the evangelicals, deficit hawks, libertarian leaners and other inconvenient but vital constituents who made up the “base” of the party. In return, the base would, after a brief flirtation with some fantasy candidate like Steve Forbes or Pat Buchanan, “hold their noses” and deliver their votes come November. This bargain was always tenuous, of course, and when some of the furthest-right activists turned against George W. Bush, citing (among other apostasies) his expansion of Medicare’s prescription drug benefit, it began to fall apart. After Barack Obama defeated McCain in 2008, the party’s once dependable base started to reconsider the wisdom of holding their noses at all.

Photo
 
Republican candidates at a pre-straw-poll debate, held at Iowa State University in 2011. Credit Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

This insurgent attitude was helped along by changes in the nomination rules. In 2010, the Republican National Committee, hoping to capture the excitement of the coast-to-coast Democratic primary competition between Obama and Hillary Clinton, introduced new voting rules that required many of the early voting states to award some delegates to losing candidates, based on their shares of the vote. The proportional voting rules would encourage struggling candidates to stay in the primaries even after successive losses, as Clinton did, because they might be able to pull together enough delegates to take the nomination in a convention-floor fight or at least use them to bargain for a prime speaking slot or cabinet post.

This shift in incentives did not go unnoticed by potential 2012 candidates, nor did changes in election law that allowed billionaire donors to form super PACs in support of pet candidacies. At the same time, increasingly widespread broadband Internet access allowed candidates to reach supporters directly with video and email appeals and supporters to send money with the tap of a smartphone, making it easier than ever for individual candidates to ignore the wishes of the party.

Into this newly chaotic Republican landscape strode Mitt Romney. There could be no doubt that it was his turn, and yet his journey to the nomination was interrupted by one against-the-odds challenger after another — Cain, Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul; always Ron Paul. It was easy to dismiss the 2012 primaries as a meaningless circus, but the onslaught did much more than tarnish the overall Republican brand. It also forced Romney to spend money he could have used against Obama and defend his right flank with embarrassing pandering that shadowed him through the general election. It was while trying to block a surge from Gingrich, for instance, that Romney told a debate audience that he was for the “self-deportation” of undocumented immigrants.

At the 2012 convention in Tampa, a group of longtime party hands, including Romney’s lawyer, Ben Ginsberg, gathered to discuss how to prevent a repeat of what had become known inside and outside the party as the “clown show.” Their aim was not just to protect the party but also to protect a potential President Romney from a primary challenge in 2016. They forced through new rules that would give future presumptive nominees more control over delegates in the event of a convention fight. They did away with the mandatory proportional delegate awards that encouraged long-shot candidacies. And, in a noticeably targeted effort, they raised the threshold that candidates needed to meet to enter their names into nomination, just as Ron Paul’s supporters were working to reach it. When John A. Boehner gaveled the rules in on a voice vote — a vote that many listeners heard as a tie, if not an outright loss — the hall erupted and a line of Ron Paul supporters walked off the floor in protest, along with many Tea Party members.

At a party meeting last winter, Reince Priebus, who as party chairman is charged with maintaining the support of all his constituencies, did restore some proportional primary and caucus voting, but only in states that held voting within a shortened two-week window. And he also condensed the nominating schedule to four and a half months from six months, and, for the first time required candidates to participate in a shortened debate schedule, determined by the party, not by the whims of the networks. (The panel that recommended those changes included names closely identified with the establishment — the former Bush White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, the Mississippi committeeman Haley Barbour and, notably, Jeb Bush’s closest adviser, Sally Bradshaw.)

Grass-roots activists have complained that the condensed schedule robs nonestablishment candidates — “movement candidates” like Carson — of the extra time they need to build momentum, money and organizations. But Priebus, who says the nomination could be close to settled by April, said it helped all the party’s constituencies when the nominee was decided quickly. “We don’t need a six-month slice-and-dice festival,” Priebus said when we spoke in mid-March. “While I can’t always control everyone’s mouth, I can control how long we can kill each other.”

All the rules changes were built to sidestep the problems of 2012. But the 2016 field is shaping up to be vastly different and far larger. A new Republican hints that he or she is considering a run seemingly every week. There are moderates like Gov. John Kasich of Ohio and former Gov. George Pataki of New York; no-compromise conservatives like Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania; business-wingers like the former Hewlett-Packard chief executive Carly Fiorina; one-of-a-kinds like Donald Trump — some 20 in all, a dozen or so who seem fairly serious about it. That opens the possibility of multiple candidates vying for all the major Republican constituencies, some of them possibly goaded along by super-PAC-funding billionaires, all of them trading wins and collecting delegates well into spring.

Giles says his candidate can capitalize on all that chaos. Rivals may laugh, but Giles argues that if Carson can make a respectable showing in Iowa, then win in South Carolina — or at least come in second should a home-state senator, Lindsey Graham, run — and come in second behind Bush or Senator Marco Rubio in their home state of Florida, he could be positioned to make a real run. But that would depend on avoiding pitfalls like Carson’s ill-considered comments on homosexuality. Rather than capitalizing on the chaos, Carson may only contribute to it.

Ben Carson is, in many ways, the ideal Republican presidential candidate. With a not-too-selective reading of his life story, conservative voters can — and do — see in him an inspiring, up-from-nowhere African-American who shares their beliefs, a right-wing answer to Barack Obama. Before he was born, his parents moved to Detroit from rural Tennessee as part of the second great migration. His father, Robert Solomon Carson, worked at a Cadillac factory. His mother, Sonya — who herself had grown up as one of 24 children and left school at third grade — cleaned houses. When Carson was 8, Sonya discovered that Robert was keeping a second family. She moved, with her two sons, into a rundown group house. It was in a part of town that Carson described to me as crawling with “big rats and roaches and all kinds of horrible things.” Sonya worked several jobs at a time and made up the shortfall with food stamps. (Carson has called for paring back the social safety net but not doing away with it.)

Carson recounts this story in his best-selling 1990 memoir, “Gifted Hands,” which also became the basis for a 2009 movie on TNT, starring Cuba Gooding Jr. as Carson. Raised as a Seventh Day Adventist, Carson realized that he wanted to become a physician during a church sermon about a missionary doctor who, while serving overseas, was almost attacked by thieves but found safety by putting his faith in God. When Carson, then 8, told his mother his new dream, “She said, ‘Absolutely, you could do it, you could do anything,’ ” he told me. Forced by his mother to read two extra books a week, he made it to Yale, then to medical school at the University of Michigan, where he decided to specialize in neurosurgery. He was selected for residency at Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, where he was named director of pediatric neurosurgery at 33, becoming the youngest person, and the first black person, to hold the title. He drew national attention by conducting a succession of operations that had never been performed successfully, most famously planning and managing the first separation of conjoined twins connected through major blood vessels in the brain.

Carson, a two-time Jimmy Carter voter, traces his conservative political awakening to a patient he met during the Reagan years. During a routine obstetrics rotation, he found himself treating an unwed pregnant teenager who had run away from her well-to-do parents. When Carson asked her how she was getting by, she informed him she was on public assistance; this led him to ponder the fact that the government was paying for the result of what he did not view as a “wise decision.” The incident, he says, fed his growing sense that the welfare system too often saps motivation and rewards irresponsible behavior. (When we spoke, he suggested that the government should cut off assistance to would-be unwed mothers, but only after warning them that it would do so within a certain amount of time, say five years. “I bet you’d see a dramatic decrease in unwed motherhood.”)

Carson’s friends at Hopkins say they do not remember him being particularly outspoken about his conservatism. He devoted most of his public engagement to urging poor kids in bad neighborhoods to use “these fancy brains God gave us,” through weekly school visits, student hospital tours and, ultimately, a multimillion-dollar scholarship program. “His issues were always medical care for the poor, education for the poor, equal opportunity — helping the less fortunate and really inspiring them as an example,” a mentor who named him to the chief pediatrics-neurosurgery post at Hopkins, Dr. Donlin Long, told me.

Even when Carson got the chance, in 1997, to speak in front of President Bill Clinton, at the national prayer breakfast, he mostly discussed the lack of role models for black children who were not sports stars or rappers. (There was possibly an oblique reference to Clinton’s sex scandals, when he told the audience that, if they are always honest, they won’t have to worry later about “skeletons in the closet.”)

Photo
 
Ben Carson at CPAC on Feb. 26 in Oxon Hill, Md. Credit Dolly Faibyshev for The New York Times

In 2011, Carson’s politics took a strident turn, mirroring that of many in his party during the Obama years. “America the Beautiful,” his sixth book, which he wrote with Candy Carson, his wife of 39 years, included a get-tough-on-illegal-immigration message and offered anti-establishment praise for the Tea Party. It suggested that blacks who voted for Obama only because he was black were themselves practicing a form of racism. (Earlier this year he admitted to Buzzfeed that portions of the book were lifted directly from several sources without proper attribution.) His prayer-breakfast performance in 2013, and the extremity of his remarks in the months afterward (Obamacare is the worst thing since slavery; the United States is “very much like Nazi Germany”; allowing same-sex marriage could lead to allowing bestiality), left some of his old friends bewildered. Students at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine protested his planned convocation address there in 2013, and he eventually backed out. When I asked Carson about the view at Hopkins that he had changed, he said his themes are still the same: “hard work, self-reliance, helping other people.” If he had become more overtly political, he said, it was only because the Obama years had led him to believe that “we’re really moving in a direction that is very, very destructive.”

None of this went unnoticed by campaign professionals. In August 2013, John Philip Sousa IV and Vernon Robinson, each of whom professes to be a virtual stranger to Carson, and who had previously been active in the anti-illegal-immigration movement, started the National Draft Ben Carson for President Committee. Sousa was just coming off a campaign to defend the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, Joe Arpaio, from a recall effort, and he told me that he found Carson’s lack of political experience refreshing. “We have 500 guys and gals with probably a collective 5,000 years experience, and look at the mess we’re in,” he said.

Many others in the party feel the same way. Carson’s PAC finished 2014 with more than $13 million in donations, more than Ready for Hillary. Much of its money has gone toward further fund-raising, but Sousa — the great-grandson of the famous composer — points out that their effort has already built far more than just a war chest, organizing leaders in all 99 of Iowa’s counties. Regardless, Carson credits the fund-raising success of Sousa and Robinson with persuading him to enter the race.

Very early the morning after the job interview, Carson was in a black S.U.V., heading from Washington to the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in Oxon Hill, Md., where he was to give the opening candidate speech of the Conservative Political Action Conference. The event, which functions as an early tryout for Republican presidential contenders, tends to skew rightward in its audience, drawing many of the same sorts of people who shouted at Boehner in Tampa. As such, it tends to favor anti-establishment candidates, but the news leading up to this year’s event was that Jeb Bush hoped to make inroads there.

It was still dark when we set out, and I joked with Carson about the hour, telling him he’d better get used to it. He retorted that his career in pediatric brain surgery made him no stranger to early mornings. This is a big theme of Carson’s presidential pitch: that neither the rigors of the campaign nor those of the White House can faze a man who held children’s lives in his hands. His life in brain surgery has prepared him for the presidency, he maintains, better than lives in politics have for his rivals. At the very least, he says, it conditioned him against getting too worked up about any problem that isn’t life threatening. “I mean, it’s grueling, but interestingly enough, I don’t feel the pressure,” he said.

At the convention hall, we were quickly surrounded by admirers. Two women were already waiting to meet him — white, middle-aged volunteers for Carson’s super PAC, who had traveled from South Carolina. One of them, Chris Horne, was holding a dog-eared and taped Bible. A founding member of the Charleston Tea Party who went on to work for Gingrich’s successful South Carolina primary campaign in 2012, Horne lamented over the attacks that Carson was sure to face. “You served us, you served the Lord, just don’t let them steal that from you,” she said. Her friend told him, “You’ve got God behind you!” Such religious evocations trailed Carson constantly while I walked the CPAC floor with him. Evangelicals are impressed not only with his devotion to their politics but also with his career path; as one of them told me, what’s more pro-life than saving babies?

During our ride to the conference, Carson told me his speech was not looking to “feed the beast.” When his appointed time came, he kept his remarks as tame as promised. “Real compassion” meant “using our intellect” to help people “climb out of dependency and realize the American dream,” he said. The national debt is going to “destroy us,” Obamacare was about “redistribution and control,” but Republicans better come forward with their own alternative before they repeal it, he said.

Because his speech was first, and it started several minutes early, the auditorium was slow to fill. Still, the first day saw a crush of people seeking autographs and pictures as he roamed the hall. The Draft Carson committee’s 150 volunteers swarmed the auditorium, collecting emails and handing out “Run Ben Run” stickers. After a quick interview with Sean Hannity, the conservative-radio and Fox News host — his second in two days — Carson was off to Tampa.

In the hours that followed his talk, the hall offered a view in miniature of what the next 12 to 14 months might hold for the party. Chris Christie, sitting across from the tough-minded talk-radio host Laura Ingraham, boasted about his multiple vetoes of Planned Parenthood funding, his refusal to raise income taxes and his belief that “sometimes people need to be told to sit down and shut up.” Cruz, an audience favorite, warning his fellow Republicans against falling for a “squishy moderate,” declared, “Take all 125,000 I.R.S. agents and put ’em on our Southern border!” Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, surging in polls, boasted that if he could face down the 100,000 union supporters who protested his legislation limiting collective bargaining for public employees, he could certainly handle ISIS. The next day, the traditional CPAC favorite Rand Paul spoke, packing the hall with his supporters who chanted “President Paul.” He warned, counter to the overall hawkish tenor of the event, that “we should not succumb to the notion that a government inept at home will somehow become successful abroad.” But he also vowed to end foreign aid to countries whose citizens are seen burning American flags. “Not one penny more to these haters of America.”

Perhaps the defining moment came near the end of the conference, when Jeb Bush spoke. In a neat trick of political gamesmanship — and a show of establishment muscle — his team had bused in an ample cheering section for the dozens of cameras on hand for his appearance. But a small contingent of Tea Party activists and Rand Paul supporters staged a walk out. When Bush began a question-and-answer session, they turned and left the auditorium to chant “U.S.A., U.S.A.” in the hallway, led by a man in colonial garb waving a huge “Don’t Tread on Me” banner. Plenty of other detractors stayed in the hall and peppered Bush’s remarks with booing as he stood by positions unpopular with the conservative grass roots: support for the Common Core standards and an immigration overhaul that provides a “path to legal status” for undocumented immigrants. Bush took it all in good humor, but finally seemed to give up.

“For those who made an ‘oo’ sound — is that what it was? — I’m marking you down as neutral,” he said. “And I want to be your second choice.”

Bush strategists told me they would not repeat Romney’s mistakes. Of course they would love to glide to an early nomination, they said, but they are prepared for a long contest and won’t be wasting any energy bending under pressure from a Paul or a Cruz or a Carson.

No one doubts that the pressure will increase, though. Despite the best wishes of the party’s leaders, GOP primary voters have given little indication that they will narrow the field quickly.

Before I left, I spotted Newt Gingrich, himself a fleeting presidential front-runner during those strange primary days of 2012. I asked him whether he thought all the party maneuvering — all the attempts to change the rules and fast-track the process — would preclude someone from presenting the sort of outside primary challenge he had carried out in the last election.

“No,” he told me, as if it was the most obvious thing in the world. “Look at where Ben Carson is right now.”

Jim Rutenberg is the chief political correspondent for the magazine. His most recent feature was about Megyn Kelly.

Ben Carson Says He’ll Seek 2016 G.O.P. Nomination

Pronovost, who played for the Red Wings, was not a prolific scorer, but he was a consummate team player with bruising checks and fearless bursts up the ice that could puncture a defense.

Marcel Pronovost, 84, Dies; Hall of Famer Shared in Five N.H.L. Titles

Public perceptions of race relations in America have grown substantially more negative in the aftermath of the death of a young black man who was injured while in police custody in Baltimore and the subsequent unrest, far eclipsing the sentiment recorded in the wake of turmoil in Ferguson, Mo., last summer.

Americans are also increasingly likely to say that the police are more apt to use deadly force against a black person, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

The poll findings highlight the challenges for local leaders and police officials in trying to maintain order while sustaining faith in the criminal justice system in a racially polarized nation.

Sixty-one percent of Americans now say race relations in this country are generally bad. That figure is up sharply from 44 percent after the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown and the unrest that followed in Ferguson in August, and 43 percent in December. In a CBS News poll just two months ago, 38 percent said race relations were generally bad. Current views are by far the worst of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The negative sentiment is echoed by broad majorities of blacks and whites alike, a stark change from earlier this year, when 58 percent of blacks thought race relations were bad, but just 35 percent of whites agreed. In August, 48 percent of blacks and 41 percent of whites said they felt that way.

Looking ahead, 44 percent of Americans think race relations are worsening, up from 36 percent in December. Forty-one percent of blacks and 46 percent of whites think so. Pessimism among whites has increased 10 points since December.

Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?
60
40
20
0
White
Black
May '14
May '15
Generally bad
Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are getting better, getting worse or staying about the same?
Getting worse
Staying the same
Getting better
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37
17
46
36
16
41
42
15

The poll finds that profound racial divisions in views of how the police use deadly force remain. Blacks are more than twice as likely to say police in most communities are more apt to use deadly force against a black person — 79 percent of blacks say so compared with 37 percent of whites. A slim majority of whites say race is not a factor in a police officer’s decision to use deadly force.

Overall, 44 percent of Americans say deadly force is more likely to be used against a black person, up from 37 percent in August and 40 percent in December.

Blacks also remain far more likely than whites to say they feel mostly anxious about the police in their community. Forty-two percent say so, while 51 percent feel mostly safe. Among whites, 8 in 10 feel mostly safe.

One proposal to address the matter — having on-duty police officers wear body cameras — receives overwhelming support. More than 9 in 10 whites and blacks alike favor it.

Continue reading the main story
How would you describe your feelings about the police in your community? Would you say they make you feel mostly safe or mostly anxious?
Mostly safe
Mostly anxious
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
75%
21
3
81
16
3
51
42
7
Continue reading the main story
In general, do you think the police in most communities are more likely to use deadly force against a black person, or more likely to use it against a white person, or don’t you think race affects police use of deadly force?
Police more likely to use deadly force against a black person
Police more likely to use deadly force against a white person
Race DOES NOT affect police use of deadly force
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37%
79%
2%
2%
1%
46%
53%
16%
9%
8%
4%
Continue reading the main story
Do you favor or oppose on-duty police officers wearing video cameras that would record events and actions as they occur?
Favor
Oppose
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
92%
93%
93%
6%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%

Asked specifically about the situation in Baltimore, most Americans expressed at least some confidence that the investigation by local authorities would be conducted fairly. But while nearly two-thirds of whites think so, fewer than half of blacks agree. Still, more blacks are confident now than were in August regarding the investigation in Ferguson. On Friday, six members of the police force involved in the arrest of Mr. Gray were charged with serious offenses, including manslaughter. The poll was conducted Thursday through Sunday; results from before charges were announced are similar to those from after.

Reaction to the recent turmoil in Baltimore, however, is similar among blacks and whites. Most Americans, 61 percent, say the unrest after Mr. Gray’s death was not justified. That includes 64 percent of whites and 57 percent of blacks.

Continue reading the main story
As you may know, a Baltimore man, Freddie Gray, recently died after being in the custody of the Baltimore police. How much confidence do you have that the investigation by local authorities into this matter will be conducted fairly?
A lot
Some
Not much
None at all
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
29%
31
22
14
5
31
33
20
11
5
20
26
30
22
In general, do you think the unrest in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray was justified, or do you think the unrest was not justified?
Justified
Not justified
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
28%
61
11
26
64
11
37
57
6

Negative View of U.S. Race Relations Grows, Poll Finds

The 6-foot-10 Phillips played alongside the 6-11 Rick Robey on the Wildcats team that won the 1978 N.C.A.A. men’s basketball title.

Mike Phillips, Half of Kentucky’s ‘Twin Towers’ of Basketball, Dies at 59

THE WRITERS ASHLEY AND JAQUAVIS COLEMAN know the value of a good curtain-raiser. The couple have co-authored dozens of novels, and they like to start them with a bang: a headlong action sequence, a blast of violence or sex that rocks readers back on their heels. But the Colemans concede they would be hard-pressed to dream up anything more gripping than their own real-life opening scene.

In the summer of 2001, JaQuavis Coleman was a 16-year-old foster child in Flint, Mich., the former auto-manufacturing mecca that had devolved, in the wake of General Motors’ plant closures, into one of the country’s most dangerous cities, with a decimated economy and a violent crime rate more than three times the national average. When JaQuavis was 8, social services had removed him from his mother’s home. He spent years bouncing between foster families. At 16, JaQuavis was also a businessman: a crack dealer with a network of street-corner peddlers in his employ.

One day that summer, JaQuavis met a fellow dealer in a parking lot on Flint’s west side. He was there to make a bulk sale of a quarter-brick, or “nine-piece” — a nine-ounce parcel of cocaine, with a street value of about $11,000. In the middle of the transaction, JaQuavis heard the telltale chirp of a walkie-talkie. His customer, he now realized, was an undercover policeman. JaQuavis jumped into his car and spun out onto the road, with two unmarked police cars in pursuit. He didn’t want to get into a high-speed chase, so he whipped his car into a church parking lot and made a run for it, darting into an alleyway behind a row of small houses, where he tossed the quarter-brick into some bushes. When JaQuavis reached the small residential street on the other side of the houses, he was greeted by the police, who handcuffed him and went to search behind the houses where, they told him, they were certain he had ditched the drugs. JaQuavis had been dealing since he was 12, had amassed more than $100,000 and had never been arrested. Now, he thought: It’s over.

But when the police looked in the bushes, they couldn’t find any cocaine. They interrogated JaQuavis, who denied having ever possessed or sold drugs. They combed the backyard alley some more. After an hour of fruitless efforts, the police were forced to unlock the handcuffs and release their suspect.

JaQuavis was baffled by the turn of events until the next day, when he received a phone call. The previous afternoon, a 15-year-old girl had been sitting in her home on the west side of Flint when she heard sirens. She looked out of the window of her bedroom, and watched a young man throw a package in the bushes behind her house. She recognized him. He was a high school classmate — a handsome, charismatic boy whom she had admired from afar. The girl crept outside and grabbed the bundle, which she hid in her basement. “I have something that belongs to you,” Ashley Snell told JaQuavis Coleman when she reached him by phone. “You wanna come over here and pick it up?”

Photo
Three of the nearly 50 works of urban fiction published by the Colemans over the last decade, often featuring drug deals, violence, sex and a brash kind of feminism.Credit Marko Metzinger

In the Colemans’ first novel, “Dirty Money” (2005), they told a version of this story. The outline was the same: the drug deal gone bad, the dope chucked in the bushes, the fateful phone call. To the extent that the authors took poetic license, it was to tone down the meet-cute improbability of the true-life events. In “Dirty Money,” the girl, Anari, and the crack dealer, Maurice, circle each other warily for a year or so before coupling up. But the facts of Ashley and JaQuavis’s romance outstripped pulp fiction. They fell in love more or less at first sight, moved into their own apartment while still in high school and were married in 2008. “We were together from the day we met,” Ashley says. “I don’t think we’ve spent more than a week apart in total over the past 14 years.”

That partnership turned out to be creative and entrepreneurial as well as romantic. Over the past decade, the Colemans have published nearly 50 books, sometimes as solo writers, sometimes under pseudonyms, but usually as collaborators with a byline that has become a trusted brand: “Ashley & JaQuavis.” They are marquee stars of urban fiction, or street lit, a genre whose inner-city settings and lurid mix of crime, sex and sensationalism have earned it comparisons to gangsta rap. The emergence of street lit is one of the big stories in recent American publishing, a juggernaut that has generated huge sales by catering to a readership — young, black and, for the most part, female — that historically has been ill-served by the book business. But the genre is also widely maligned. Street lit is subject to a kind of triple snobbery: scorned by literati who look down on genre fiction generally, ignored by a white publishing establishment that remains largely indifferent to black books and disparaged by African-American intellectuals for poor writing, coarse values and trafficking in racial stereotypes.

But if a certain kind of cultural prestige is shut off to the Colemans, they have reaped other rewards. They’ve built a large and loyal fan base, which gobbles up the new Ashley & JaQuavis titles that arrive every few months. Many of those books are sold at street-corner stands and other off-the-grid venues in African-American neighborhoods, a literary gray market that doesn’t register a blip on best-seller tallies. Yet the Colemans’ most popular series now regularly crack the trade fiction best-seller lists of The New York Times and Publishers Weekly. For years, the pair had no literary agent; they sold hundreds of thousands of books without banking a penny in royalties. Still, they have earned millions of dollars, almost exclusively from cash-for-manuscript deals negotiated directly with independent publishing houses. In short, though little known outside of the world of urban fiction, the Colemans are one of America’s most successful literary couples, a distinction they’ve achieved, they insist, because of their work’s gritty authenticity and their devotion to a primal literary virtue: the power of the ripping yarn.

“When you read our books, you’re gonna realize: ‘Ashley & JaQuavis are storytellers,’ ” says Ashley. “Our tales will get your heart pounding.”

THE COLEMANS’ HOME BASE — the cottage from which they operate their cottage industry — is a spacious four-bedroom house in a genteel suburb about 35 miles north of downtown Detroit. The house is plush, but when I visited this past winter, it was sparsely appointed. The couple had just recently moved in, and had only had time to fully furnish the bedroom of their 4-year-old son, Quaye.

In conversation, Ashley and JaQuavis exude both modesty and bravado: gratitude for their good fortune and bootstrappers’ pride in having made their own luck. They talk a lot about their time in the trenches, the years they spent as a drug dealer and “ride-or-die girl” tandem. In Flint they learned to “grind hard.” Writing, they say, is merely a more elevated kind of grind.

“Instead of hitting the block like we used to, we hit the laptops,” says Ashley. “I know what every word is worth. So while I’m writing, I’m like: ‘Okay, there’s a hundred dollars. There’s a thousand dollars. There’s five thousand dollars.’ ”

They maintain a rigorous regimen. They each try to write 5,000 words per day, five days a week. The writers stagger their shifts: JaQuavis goes to bed at 7 p.m. and wakes up early, around 3 or 4 in the morning, to work while his wife and child sleep. Ashley writes during the day, often in libraries or at Starbucks.

They divide the labor in other ways. Chapters are divvied up more or less equally, with tasks assigned according to individual strengths. (JaQuavis typically handles character development. Ashley loves writing murder scenes.) The results are stitched together, with no editorial interference from one author in the other’s text. The real work, they contend, is the brainstorming. The Colemans spend weeks mapping out their plot-driven books — long conversations that turn into elaborate diagrams on dry-erase boards. “JaQuavis and I are so close, it makes the process real easy,” says Ashley. “Sometimes when I’m thinking of something, a plot point, he’ll say it out loud, and I’m like: ‘Wait — did I say that?’ ”

Their collaboration developed by accident, and on the fly. Both were bookish teenagers. Ashley read lots of Judy Blume and John Grisham; JaQuavis liked Shakespeare, Richard Wright and “Atlas Shrugged.” (Their first official date was at a Borders bookstore, where Ashley bought “The Coldest Winter Ever,” the Sister Souljah novel often credited with kick-starting the contemporary street-lit movement.) In 2003, Ashley, then 17, was forced to terminate an ectopic pregnancy. She was bedridden for three weeks, and to provide distraction and boost her spirits, JaQuavis challenged his girlfriend to a writing contest. “She just wasn’t talking. She was laying in bed. I said, ‘You know what? I bet you I could write a better book than you.’ My wife is real competitive. So I said, ‘Yo, all right, $500 bet.’ And I saw her eyes spark, like, ‘What?! You can’t write no better book than me!’ So I wrote about three chapters. She wrote about three chapters. Two days later, we switched.”

The result, hammered out in a few days, would become “Dirty Money.” Two years later, when Ashley and JaQuavis were students at Ferris State University in Western Michigan, they sold the manuscript to Urban Books, a street-lit imprint founded by the best-selling author Carl Weber. At the time, JaQuavis was still making his living selling drugs. When Ashley got the phone call informing her that their book had been bought, she assumed they’d hit it big, and flushed more than $10,000 worth of cocaine down the toilet. Their advance was a mere $4,000.

Photo
The roots of street lit, found in the midcentury detective novels of Chester Himes and the ‘60s and ‘70s “ghetto fiction” of Iceberg Slim and Donald Goines.Credit Marko Metzinger

Those advances would soon increase, eventually reaching five and six figures. The Colemans built their career, JaQuavis says, in a manner that made sense to him as a veteran dope peddler: by flooding the street with product. From the start, they were prolific, churning out books at a rate of four or five a year. Their novels made their way into stores; the now-defunct chain Waldenbooks, which had stores in urban areas typically bypassed by booksellers, was a major engine of the street-lit market. But Ashley and JaQuavis took advantage of distribution channels established by pioneering urban fiction authors such as Teri Woods and Vickie Stringer, and a network of street-corner tables, magazine stands, corner shops and bodegas. Like rappers who establish their bona fides with gray-market mixtapes, street-lit authors use this system to circumnavigate industry gatekeepers, bringing their work straight to the genre’s core readership. But urban fiction has other aficionados, in less likely places. “Our books are so popular in the prison system,” JaQuavis says. “We’re banned in certain penitentiaries. Inmates fight over the books — there are incidents, you know? I have loved ones in jail, and they’re like: ‘Yo, your books can’t come in here. It’s against the rules.’ ”

The appeal of the Colemans’ work is not hard to fathom. The books are formulaic and taut; they deliver the expected goods efficiently and exuberantly. The titles telegraph the contents: “Diary of a Street Diva,” “Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang,” “Murderville.” The novels serve up a stream of explicit sex and violence in a slangy, tangy, profane voice. In Ashley & JaQuavis’s books people don’t get killed: they get “popped,” “laid out,” get their “cap twisted back.” The smut is constant, with emphasis on the earthy, sticky, olfactory particulars. Romance novel clichés — shuddering orgasms, heroic carnal feats, superlative sexual skill sets — are rendered in the Colemans’ punchy patois.

Subtlety, in other words, isn’t Ashley & JaQuavis’s forte. But their books do have a grainy specificity. In “The Cartel” (2008), the first novel in the Colemans’ best-selling saga of a Miami drug syndicate, they catch the sights and smells of a crack workshop in a housing project: the nostril-stinging scent of cocaine and baking soda bubbling on stovetops; the teams of women, stripped naked except for hospital masks so they can’t pilfer the merchandise, “cutting up the cooked coke on the round wood table.” The subject matter is dark, but the Colemans’ tone is not quite noir. Even in the grimmest scenes, the mood is high-spirited, with the writers palpably relishing the lewd and gory details: the bodies writhing in boudoirs and crumpling under volleys of bullets, the geysers of blood and other bodily fluids.

The luridness of street lit has made it a flashpoint, inciting controversy reminiscent of the hip-hop culture wars of the 1980s and ’90s. But the street-lit debate touches deeper historical roots, reviving decades-old arguments in black literary circles about the mandate to uplift the race and present wholesome images of African-Americans. In 1928, W. E. B. Du Bois slammed the “licentiousness” of “Home to Harlem,” Claude McKay’s rollicking novel of Harlem nightlife. McKay’s book, Du Bois wrote, “for the most part nauseates me, and after the dirtier parts of its filth I feel distinctly like taking a bath.” Similar sentiments have greeted 21st-century street lit. In a 2006 New York Times Op-Ed essay, the journalist and author Nick Chiles decried “the sexualization and degradation of black fiction.” African-American bookstores, Chiles complained, are “overrun with novels that . . . appeal exclusively to our most prurient natures — as if these nasty books were pairing off back in the stockrooms like little paperback rabbits and churning out even more graphic offspring that make Ralph Ellison books cringe into a dusty corner.”

Copulating paperbacks aside, it’s clear that the street-lit debate is about more than literature, touching on questions of paternalism versus populism, and on middle-class anxieties about the black underclass. “It’s part and parcel of black elites’ efforts to define not only a literary tradition, but a racial politics,” said Kinohi Nishikawa, an assistant professor of English and African-American Studies at Princeton University. “There has always been a sense that because African-Americans’ opportunities to represent themselves are so limited in the first place, any hint of criminality or salaciousness would necessarily be a knock on the entire racial politics. One of the pressing debates about African-American literature today is: If we can’t include writers like Ashley & JaQuavis, to what extent is the foundation of our thinking about black literature faulty? Is it just a literature for elites? Or can it be inclusive, bringing urban fiction under the purview of our umbrella term ‘African-American literature’?”

Defenders of street lit note that the genre has a pedigree: a tradition of black pulp fiction that stretches from Chester Himes, the midcentury author of hardboiled Harlem detective stories, to the 1960s and ’70s “ghetto fiction” of Iceberg Slim and Donald Goines, to the current wave of urban fiction authors. Others argue for street lit as a social good, noting that it attracts a large audience that might otherwise never read at all. Scholars like Nishikawa link street lit to recent studies showing increased reading among African-Americans. A 2014 Pew Research Center report found that a greater percentage of black Americans are book readers than whites or Latinos.

For their part, the Colemans place their work in the broader black literary tradition. “You have Maya Angelou, Alice Walker, James Baldwin — all of these traditional black writers, who wrote about the struggles of racism, injustice, inequality,” says Ashley. “We’re writing about the struggle as it happens now. It’s just a different struggle. I’m telling my story. I’m telling the struggle of a black girl from Flint, Michigan, who grew up on welfare.”

Photo
The Colemans in their new four-bedroom house in the northern suburbs of Detroit.Credit Courtesy of Ashley and JaQuavis Coleman

Perhaps there is a high-minded case to be made for street lit. But the virtues of Ashley & JaQuavis’s work are more basic. Their novels do lack literary polish. The writing is not graceful; there are passages of clunky exposition and sex scenes that induce guffaws and eye rolls. But the pleasure quotient is high. The books flaunt a garish brand of feminism, with women characters cast not just as vixens, but also as gangsters — cold-blooded killers, “murder mamas.” The stories are exceptionally well-plotted. “The Cartel” opens by introducing its hero, the crime boss Carter Diamond; on page 9, a gunshot spatters Diamond’s brain across the interior of a police cruiser. The book then flashes back seven years and begins to hurtle forward again — a bullet train, whizzing readers through shifting alliances, romantic entanglements and betrayals, kidnappings, shootouts with Haitian and Dominican gangsters, and a cliffhanger closing scene that leaves the novel’s heroine tied to a chair in a basement, gruesomely tortured to the edge of death. Ashley & JaQuavis’s books are not Ralph Ellison, certainly, but they build up quite a head of steam. They move.

The Colemans are moving themselves these days. They recently signed a deal with St. Martin’s Press, which will bring out the next installment in the “Cartel” series as well as new solo series by both writers. The St. Martin’s deal is both lucrative and legitimizing — a validation of Ashley and JaQuavis’s work by one of publishing’s most venerable houses. The Colemans’ ambitions have grown, as well. A recent trilogy, “Murderville,” tackles human trafficking and the blood-diamond industry in West Africa, with storylines that sweep from Sierra Leone to Mexico to Los Angeles. Increasingly, Ashley & JaQuavis are leaning on research — traveling to far-flung settings and hitting the books in the libraries — and spending less time mining their own rough-and-tumble past.

But Flint remains a source of inspiration. One evening not long ago, JaQuavis led me on a tour of his hometown: a popular roadside bar; the parking lot where he met the undercover cop for the ill-fated drug deal; Ashley’s old house, the site of his almost-arrest. He took me to a ramshackle vehicle repair shop on Flint’s west side, where he worked as a kid, washing cars. He showed me a bathroom at the rear of the garage, where, at age 12, he sneaked away to inspect the first “boulder” of crack that he ever sold. A spray-painted sign on the garage wall, which JaQuavis remembered from his time at the car wash, offered words of warning:

WHAT EVERY YOUNG MAN SHOULD KNOW
ABOUT USING A GUN:
MURDER . . . 30 Years
ARMED ROBBERY . . . 15 Years
ASSAULT . . . 15 Years
RAPE . . . 20 Years
POSSESSION . . . 5 Years
JACKING . . . 20 YEARS

“We still love Flint, Michigan,” JaQuavis says. “It’s so seedy, so treacherous. But there’s some heart in this city. This is where it all started, selling books out the box. In the days when we would get those little $40,000 advances, they’d send us a couple boxes of books for free. We would hit the streets to sell our books, right out of the car trunk. It was a hustle. It still is.”

One old neighborhood asset that the Colemans have not shaken off is swagger. “My wife is the best female writer in the game,” JaQuavis told me. “I believe I’m the best male writer in the game. I’m sleeping next to the best writer in the world. And she’s doing the same.”

 
From T Magazine: Street Lit’s Power Couple
Frontline  An installment of this PBS program looks at the effects of Ebola on Liberia and other countries, as well as the origins of the outbreak.
Frontline

Frontline An installment of this PBS program looks at the effects of Ebola on Liberia and other countries, as well as the origins of the outbreak.

The program traces the outbreak to its origin, thought to be a tree full of bats in Guinea.

Review: ‘9-Man’ Is More Than a Game for Chinese-Americans

A variation of volleyball with nine men on each side is profiled Tuesday night on the World Channel in an absorbing documentary called “9-Man.”

Television

‘Hard Earned’ Documents the Plight of the Working Poor

“Hard Earned,” an Al Jazeera America series, follows five working-class families scrambling to stay ahead on limited incomes.

Review: ‘Frontline’ Looks at Missteps During the Ebola Outbreak

At the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Suzman’s signature accomplishment was the central role he played in creating a global network of surveys on aging.

Richard Suzman, 72, Dies; Researcher Influenced Global Surveys on Aging

A lapsed seminarian, Mr. Chambers succeeded Saul Alinsky as leader of the social justice umbrella group Industrial Areas Foundation.

Edward Chambers, Early Leader in Community Organizing, Dies at 85

GREENWICH, Conn. — Mago is in the bedroom. You can go in.

The big man lies on a hospital bed with his bare feet scraping its bottom rail. His head is propped on a scarlet pillow, the left temple dented, the right side paralyzed. His dark hair is kept just long enough to conceal the scars.

The occasional sounds he makes are understood only by his wife, but he still has that punctuating left hand. In slow motion, the fingers curl and close. A thumbs-up greeting.

Hello, Mago.

This is Magomed Abdusalamov, 34, also known as the Russian Tyson, also known as Mago. He is a former heavyweight boxer who scored four knockouts and 14 technical knockouts in his first 18 professional fights. He preferred to stand between rounds. Sitting conveyed weakness.

But Mago lost his 19th fight, his big chance, at the packed Theater at Madison Square Garden in November 2013. His 19th decision, and his last.

Now here he is, in a small bedroom in a working-class neighborhood in Greenwich, in a modest house his family rents cheap from a devoted friend. The air-pressure machine for his mattress hums like an expectant crowd.

 

Photo
 
Mike Perez, left, and Magomed Abdusalamov during the fight in which Abdusalamov was injured. Credit Joe Camporeale/USA Today Sports, via Reuters

 

Today is like any other day, except for those days when he is hurried in crisis to the hospital. Every three hours during the night, his slight wife, Bakanay, 28, has risen to turn his 6-foot-3 body — 210 pounds of dead weight. It has to be done. Infections of the gaping bedsore above his tailbone have nearly killed him.

Then, with the help of a young caretaker, Baka has gotten two of their daughters off to elementary school and settled down the toddler. Yes, Mago and Baka are blessed with all girls, but they had also hoped for a son someday.

They feed Mago as they clean him; it’s easier that way. For breakfast, which comes with a side of crushed antiseizure pills, he likes oatmeal with a squirt of Hershey’s chocolate syrup. But even oatmeal must be puréed and fed to him by spoon.

He opens his mouth to indicate more, the way a baby does. But his paralysis has made everything a choking hazard. His water needs a stirring of powdered food thickener, and still he chokes — eh-eh-eh — as he tries to cough up what will not go down.

Advertisement

Mago used to drink only water. No alcohol. Not even soda. A sip of juice would be as far as he dared. Now even water betrays him.

With the caretaker’s help, Baka uses a washcloth and soap to clean his body and shampoo his hair. How handsome still, she has thought. Sometimes, in the night, she leaves the bedroom to watch old videos, just to hear again his voice in the fullness of life. She cries, wipes her eyes and returns, feigning happiness. Mago must never see her sad.

 

Photo
 
 Abdusalamov's hand being massaged. Credit Ángel Franco/The New York Times

 

When Baka finishes, Mago is cleanshaven and fresh down to his trimmed and filed toenails. “I want him to look good,” she says.

Theirs was an arranged Muslim marriage in Makhachkala, in the Russian republic of Dagestan. He was 23, she was 18 and their future hinged on boxing. Sometimes they would shadowbox in love, her David to his Goliath. You are so strong, he would tell her.

His father once told him he could either be a bandit or an athlete, but if he chose banditry, “I will kill you.” This paternal advice, Mago later told The Ventura County Reporter, “made it a very easy decision for me.”

Mago won against mediocre competition, in Moscow and Hollywood, Fla., in Las Vegas and Johnstown, Pa. He was knocked down only once, and even then, it surprised more than hurt. He scored a technical knockout in the next round.

It all led up to this: the undercard at the Garden, Mike Perez vs. Magomed Abdusalamov, 10 rounds, on HBO. A win, he believed, would improve his chances of taking on the heavyweight champion Wladimir Klitschko, who sat in the crowd of 4,600 with his fiancée, the actress Hayden Panettiere, watching.

Wearing black-and-red trunks and a green mouth guard, Mago went to work. But in the first round, a hard forearm to his left cheek rocked him. At the bell, he returned to his corner, and this time, he sat down. “I think it’s broken,” he repeatedly said in Russian.

 

Photo
 
Bakanay Abdusalamova, Abdusalamov's wife, and her injured husband and a masseur in the background. Credit Ángel Franco/The New York Times

 

Maybe at that point, somebody — the referee, the ringside doctors, his handlers — should have stopped the fight, under a guiding principle: better one punch too early than one punch too late. But the bloody trade of blows continued into the seventh, eighth, ninth, a hand and orbital bone broken, his face transforming.

Meanwhile, in the family’s apartment in Miami, Baka forced herself to watch the broadcast. She could see it in his swollen eyes. Something was off.

After the final round, Perez raised his tattooed arms in victory, and Mago wandered off in a fog. He had taken 312 punches in about 40 minutes, for a purse of $40,000.

 

 

In the locker room, doctors sutured a cut above Mago’s left eye and tested his cognitive abilities. He did not do well. The ambulance that waits in expectation at every fight was not summoned by boxing officials.

Blood was pooling in Mago’s cranial cavity as he left the Garden. He vomited on the pavement while his handlers flagged a taxi to St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital. There, doctors induced a coma and removed part of his skull to drain fluids and ease the swelling.

Then came the stroke.

 

Photo
 
A championship belt belonging to Abdusalamov and a card from one of his daughters. Credit Ángel Franco/The New York Times

 

It is lunchtime now, and the aroma of puréed beef and potatoes lingers. So do the questions.

How will Mago and Baka pay the $2 million in medical bills they owe? What if their friend can no longer offer them this home? Will they win their lawsuits against the five ringside doctors, the referee, and a New York State boxing inspector? What about Mago’s future care?

Most of all: Is this it?

A napkin rests on Mago’s chest. As another spoonful of mush approaches, he opens his mouth, half-swallows, chokes, and coughs until it clears. Eh-eh-eh. Sometimes he turns bluish, but Baka never shows fear. Always happy for Mago.

Some days he is wheeled out for physical therapy or speech therapy. Today, two massage therapists come to knead his half-limp body like a pair of skilled corner men.

Soon, Mago will doze. Then his three daughters, ages 2, 6 and 9, will descend upon him to talk of their day. Not long ago, the oldest lugged his championship belt to school for a proud show-and-tell moment. Her classmates were amazed at the weight of it.

Then, tonight, there will be more puréed food and pulverized medication, more coughing, and more tender care from his wife, before sleep comes.

Goodbye, Mago.

He half-smiles, raises his one good hand, and forms a fist.

Meet Mago, Former Heavyweight

Gagne wrestled professionally from the late 1940s until the 1980s and was a transitional figure between the early 20th century barnstormers and the steroidal sideshows of today

Verne Gagne, Wrestler Who Grappled Through Two Eras, Dies at 89

Over the last five years or so, it seemed there was little that Dean G. Skelos, the majority leader of the New York Senate, would not do for his son.

He pressed a powerful real estate executive to provide commissions to his son, a 32-year-old title insurance salesman, according to a federal criminal complaint. He helped get him a job at an environmental company and employed his influence to help the company get government work. He used his office to push natural gas drilling regulations that would have increased his son’s commissions.

He even tried to direct part of a $5.4 billion state budget windfall to fund government contracts that the company was seeking. And when the company was close to securing a storm-water contract from Nassau County, the senator, through an intermediary, pressured the company to pay his son more — or risk having the senator subvert the bid.

The criminal complaint, unsealed on Monday, lays out corruption charges against Senator Skelos and his son, Adam B. Skelos, the latest scandal to seize Albany, and potentially alter its power structure.

Photo
 
Preet Bharara, the United States attorney in Manhattan, discussed the case involving Dean G. Skelos and his son, Adam. Credit Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

The repeated and diverse efforts by Senator Skelos, a Long Island Republican, to use what prosecutors said was his political influence to find work, or at least income, for his son could send both men to federal prison. If they are convicted of all six charges against them, they face up to 20 years in prison for each of four of the six counts and up to 10 years for the remaining two.

Senator Kenneth P. LaValle, of Long Island, who serves as chairman of the Republican conference, emerged from a closed-door meeting Monday night to say that conference members agreed that Mr. Skelos should be benefited the “presumption of innocence,” and would stay in his leadership role.

“The leader has indicated he would like to remain as leader,” said Mr. LaValle, “and he has the support of the conference.” The case against Mr. Skelos and his son grew out of a broader inquiry into political corruption by the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, that has already changed the face of the state capital. It is based in part, according to the six-count complaint, on conversations secretly recorded by one of two cooperating witnesses, and wiretaps on the cellphones of the senator and his son. Those recordings revealed that both men were concerned about electronic surveillance, and illustrated the son’s unsuccessful efforts to thwart it.

Advertisement

Adam Skelos took to using a “burner” phone, the complaint says, and told his father he wanted them to speak through a FaceTime video call in an apparent effort to avoid detection. They also used coded language at times.

At one point, Adam Skelos was recorded telling a Senate staff member of his frustration in not being able to speak openly to his father on the phone, noting that he could not “just send smoke signals or a little pigeon” carrying a message.

The 43-page complaint, sworn out by Paul M. Takla, a special agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlines a five-year scheme to “monetize” the senator’s official position; it also lays bare the extent to which a father sought to use his position to help his son.

The charges accuse the two men of extorting payments through a real estate developer, Glenwood Management, based on Long Island, and the environmental company, AbTech Industries, in Scottsdale, Ariz., with the expectation that the money paid to Adam Skelos — nearly $220,000 in total — would influence his father’s actions.

Glenwood, one of the state’s most prolific campaign donors, had ties to AbTech through investments in the environmental firm’s parent company by Glenwood’s founding family and a senior executive.

The accusations in the complaint portray Senator Skelos as a man who, when it came to his son, was not shy about twisting arms, even in situations that might give other arm-twisters pause.

Seeking to help his son, Senator Skelos turned to the executive at Glenwood, which develops rental apartments in New York City and has much at stake when it comes to real estate legislation in Albany. The senator urged him to direct business to his son, who sold title insurance.

After much prodding, the executive, Charles C. Dorego, engineered a $20,000 payment to Adam Skelos from a title insurance company even though he did no work for the money. But far more lucrative was a consultant position that Mr. Dorego arranged for Adam Skelos at AbTech, which seeks government contracts to treat storm water. (Mr. Dorego is not identified by name in the complaint, but referred to only as CW-1, for Cooperating Witness 1.)

Senator Skelos appeared to take an active interest in his son’s new line of work. Adam Skelos sent him several drafts of his consulting agreement with AbTech, the complaint says, as well as the final deal that was struck.

“Mazel tov,” his father replied.

Senator Skelos sent relevant news articles to his son, including one about a sewage leak near Albany. When AbTech wanted to seek government contracts after Hurricane Sandy, the senator got on a conference call with his son and an AbTech executive, Bjornulf White, and offered advice. (Like Mr. Dorego, Mr. White is not named in the complaint, but referred to as CW-2.)

The assistance paid off: With the senator’s help, AbTech secured a contract worth up to $12 million from Nassau County, a big break for a struggling small business.

But the money was slow to materialize. The senator expressed impatience with county officials.

Adam Skelos, in a phone call with Mr. White in late December, suggested that his father would seek to punish the county. “I tell you this, the state is not going to do a [expletive] thing for the county,” he said.

Three days later, Senator Skelos pressed his case with the Nassau County executive, Edward P. Mangano, a fellow Republican. “Somebody feels like they’re just getting jerked around the last two years,” the senator said, referring to his son in what the complaint described as “coded language.”

The next day, the senator pursued the matter, as he and Mr. Mangano attended a wake for a slain New York City police officer. Senator Skelos then reassured his son, who called him while he was still at the wake. “All claims that are in will be taken care of,” the senator said.

AbTech’s fortunes appeared to weigh on his son. At one point in January, Adam Skelos told his father that if the company did not succeed, he would “lose the ability to pay for things.”

Making matters worse, in recent months, Senator Skelos and his son appeared to grow wary about who was watching them. In addition to making calls on the burner phone, Adam Skelos said he used the FaceTime video calling “because that doesn’t show up on the phone bill,” as he told Mr. White.

In late February, Adam Skelos arranged a pair of meetings between Mr. White and state senators; AbTech needed to win state legislation that would allow its contract to move beyond its initial stages. But Senator Skelos deemed the plan too risky and caused one of the meetings to be canceled.

In another recorded call, Adam Skelos, promising to be “very, very vague” on the phone, urged his father to allow the meeting. The senator offered a warning. “Right now we are in dangerous times, Adam,” he told him.

A month later, in another phone call that was recorded by the authorities, Adam Skelos complained that his father could not give him “real advice” about AbTech while the two men were speaking over the telephone.

“You can’t talk normally,” he told his father, “because it’s like [expletive] Preet Bharara is listening to every [expletive] phone call. It’s just [expletive] frustrating.”

“It is,” his father agreed.

Dean Skelos, Albany Senate Leader, Aided Son at All Costs, U.S. Says

Even as a high school student, Dave Goldberg was urging female classmates to speak up. As a young dot-com executive, he had one girlfriend after another, but fell hard for a driven friend named Sheryl Sandberg, pining after her for years. After they wed, Mr. Goldberg pushed her to negotiate hard for high compensation and arranged his schedule so that he could be home with their children when she was traveling for work.

Mr. Goldberg, who died unexpectedly on Friday, was a genial, 47-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur who built his latest company, SurveyMonkey, from a modest enterprise to one recently valued by investors at $2 billion. But he was also perhaps the signature male feminist of his era: the first major chief executive in memory to spur his wife to become as successful in business as he was, and an essential figure in “Lean In,” Ms. Sandberg’s blockbuster guide to female achievement.

Over the weekend, even strangers were shocked at his death, both because of his relatively young age and because they knew of him as the living, breathing, car-pooling center of a new philosophy of two-career marriage.

“They were very much the role models for what this next generation wants to grapple with,” said Debora L. Spar, the president of Barnard College. In a 2011 commencement speech there, Ms. Sandberg told the graduates that whom they married would be their most important career decision.

In the play “The Heidi Chronicles,” revived on Broadway this spring, a male character who is the founder of a media company says that “I don’t want to come home to an A-plus,” explaining that his ambitions require him to marry an unthreatening helpmeet. Mr. Goldberg grew up to hold the opposite view, starting with his upbringing in progressive Minneapolis circles where “there was woman power in every aspect of our lives,” Jeffrey Dachis, a childhood friend, said in an interview.

The Goldberg parents read “The Feminine Mystique” together — in fact, Mr. Goldberg’s father introduced it to his wife, according to Ms. Sandberg’s book. In 1976, Paula Goldberg helped found a nonprofit to aid children with disabilities. Her husband, Mel, a law professor who taught at night, made the family breakfast at home.

Later, when Dave Goldberg was in high school and his prom date, Jill Chessen, stayed silent in a politics class, he chastised her afterward. He said, “You need to speak up,” Ms. Chessen recalled in an interview. “They need to hear your voice.”

Years later, when Karin Gilford, an early employee at Launch Media, Mr. Goldberg’s digital music company, became a mother, he knew exactly what to do. He kept giving her challenging assignments, she recalled, but also let her work from home one day a week. After Yahoo acquired Launch, Mr. Goldberg became known for distributing roses to all the women in the office on Valentine’s Day.

Ms. Sandberg, who often describes herself as bossy-in-a-good-way, enchanted him when they became friendly in the mid-1990s. He “was smitten with her,” Ms. Chessen remembered. Ms. Sandberg was dating someone else, but Mr. Goldberg still hung around, even helping her and her then-boyfriend move, recalled Bob Roback, a friend and co-founder of Launch. When they finally married in 2004, friends remember thinking how similar the two were, and that the qualities that might have made Ms. Sandberg intimidating to some men drew Mr. Goldberg to her even more.

Over the next decade, Mr. Goldberg and Ms. Sandberg pioneered new ways of capturing information online, had a son and then a daughter, became immensely wealthy, and hashed out their who-does-what-in-this-marriage issues. Mr. Goldberg’s commute from the Bay Area to Los Angeles became a strain, so he relocated, later joking that he “lost the coin flip” of where they would live. He paid the bills, she planned the birthday parties, and both often left their offices at 5:30 so they could eat dinner with their children before resuming work afterward.

Friends in Silicon Valley say they were careful to conduct their careers separately, politely refusing when outsiders would ask one about the other’s work: Ms. Sandberg’s role building Facebook into an information and advertising powerhouse, and Mr. Goldberg at SurveyMonkey, which made polling faster and cheaper. But privately, their work was intertwined. He often began statements to his team with the phrase “Well, Sheryl said” sharing her business advice. He counseled her, too, starting with her salary negotiations with Mark Zuckerberg.

“I wanted Mark to really feel he stretched to get Sheryl, because she was worth it,” Mr. Goldberg explained in a 2013 “60 Minutes” interview, his Minnesota accent and his smile intact as he offered a rare peek of the intersection of marriage and money at the top of corporate life.

 

 

While his wife grew increasingly outspoken about women’s advancement, Mr. Goldberg quietly advised the men in the office on family and partnership matters, an associate said. Six out of 16 members of SurveyMonkey’s management team are female, an almost unheard-of ratio among Silicon Valley “unicorns,” or companies valued at over $1 billion.

When Mellody Hobson, a friend and finance executive, wrote a chapter of “Lean In” about women of color for the college edition of the book, Mr. Goldberg gave her feedback on the draft, a clue to his deep involvement. He joked with Ms. Hobson that she was too long-winded, like Ms. Sandberg, but aside from that, he said he loved the chapter, she said in an interview.

By then, Mr. Goldberg was a figure of fascination who inspired a “where can I get one of those?” reaction among many of the women who had read the best seller “Lean In.” Some lamented that Ms. Sandberg’s advice hinged too much on marrying a Dave Goldberg, who was humble enough to plan around his wife, attentive enough to worry about which shoes his young daughter would wear, and rich enough to help pay for the help that made the family’s balancing act manageable.

Now that he is gone, and Ms. Sandberg goes from being half of a celebrated partnership to perhaps the business world’s most prominent single mother, the pages of “Lean In” carry a new sting of loss.

“We are never at 50-50 at any given moment — perfect equality is hard to define or sustain — but we allow the pendulum to swing back and forth between us,” she wrote in 2013, adding that they were looking forward to raising teenagers together.

“Fortunately, I have Dave to figure it out with me,” she wrote.

Dave Goldberg Was Lifelong Women’s Advocate

A 214-pound Queens housewife struggled with a lifelong addiction to food until she shed 72 pounds and became the public face of the worldwide weight-control empire Weight Watchers.

Jean Nidetch, 91, Dies; Pounds Came Off, and Weight Watchers Was Born
harga umroh ramadhan di Cipinang Cempedak jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah awal tahun di Pasar Rebo jakarta
harga berangkat umrah januari di Pisangan Timur jakarta
paket umrah januari di Jatinegara jakarta
paket promo umrah april di Matraman jakarta
harga berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Jati jakarta
paket umrah desember di Cilangkap jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh februari di Kramat Jati jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah juni di Malaka Jaya jakarta
biaya umrah juni di Matraman jakarta
paket berangkat umrah januari di Cipinang Muara jakarta
harga umrah januari di Matraman jakarta
harga umrah akhir tahun di Kramat Jati jakarta
paket berangkat umroh april di Pulo Gadung jakarta
biaya paket umrah maret di Cipinang jakarta
paket promo umroh maret di Cipayung jakarta
harga paket umrah awal tahun di Bali Mester jakarta
harga berangkat umroh juni di Pekayon jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh februari di Utan Kayu Selatan jakarta
promo berangkat umroh april di Cipinang Melayu jakarta
paket umroh februari di Jati jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh mei di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya umrah juni di Ciracas jakarta
promo umroh desember di Matraman jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh awal tahun di Penggilingan jakarta
biaya paket umrah awal tahun di Pinang Ranti jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh maret di Cakung jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah desember di Pasar Rebo jakarta
harga paket umrah februari bekasi utara
paket promo berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Klender jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah juni di Rawa Bunga jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh april di Kalisari jakarta
promo umrah maret di Kampung Melayu jakarta
paket promo umrah februari di Jatinegara Kaum jakarta
harga paket umrah juni di Rawa Terate jakarta
biaya paket umrah desember di Pasar Rebo jakarta
harga berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Halim Perdanakusuma jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah mei di Cipayung jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Munjul jakarta
biaya paket umrah februari di Dukuh jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh awal tahun di Cilangkap jakarta
paket umrah februari di Cipinang Besar Selatan jakarta
biaya paket umrah maret di Cakung jakarta
promo berangkat umrah april di Pondok Ranggon jakarta
harga paket berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Kampung Melayu jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh januari di Jatinegara Kaum jakarta
harga umrah awal tahun di Kayu Putih jakarta
biaya berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Lubang Buaya jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah mei di Penggilingan jakarta
promo umroh januari di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh akhir tahun di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
paket umrah februari di Jati jakarta
promo umroh februari di Bali Mester jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah desember di Klender jakarta
harga berangkat umroh april di Cilangkap jakarta
promo berangkat umroh maret di Pisangan Baru jakarta
promo umroh mei di Cibubur jakarta
biaya umroh juni di Cakung Barat jakarta
paket promo umrah desember di Kayu Manis jakarta
promo umroh februari di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
promo umrah ramadhan di Munjul jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh mei di Pal Meriam jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umrah juni bogor
paket berangkat umroh juni di Bali Mester jakarta
paket promo berangkat umroh maret di Kampung Tengah jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah juni di Susukan jakarta
biaya umrah april bekasi utara
paket berangkat umrah desember di Matraman jakarta
paket berangkat umrah desember di Cipayung jakarta
harga berangkat umroh awal tahun di Cipinang jakarta
biaya paket umrah februari di Utan Kayu Utara jakarta
biaya umrah maret di Cipinang Muara jakarta
promo berangkat umroh februari di Pisangan Timur jakarta
harga umrah januari di Kampung Tengah jakarta
paket berangkat umrah januari di Pal Meriam jakarta
harga umroh desember di Bambu Apus jakarta
biaya paket umroh desember di Kayu Putih jakarta
harga berangkat umrah awal tahun di Cipinang Melayu jakarta
paket umrah mei di Utan Kayu Utara jakarta
biaya berangkat umrah akhir tahun di Kampung Gedong,Cijantung jakarta
promo berangkat umroh april di Rawa Terate jakarta
paket promo umroh desember di Kebon Pala jakarta
promo berangkat umrah ramadhan di Kampung Melayu jakarta
biaya umroh april di Cipinang Melayu jakarta
promo berangkat umroh desember di Pasar Rebo jakarta
harga umroh januari di Cakung Timur jakarta
biaya paket berangkat umroh mei di Klender jakarta
paket promo umroh januari di Lubang Buaya jakarta
promo umrah awal tahun di Susukan jakarta
paket umrah februari di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya paket umroh januari di Rawa Bunga jakarta
biaya umroh januari di Rawa Bunga jakarta
harga berangkat umrah mei di Kampung Baru jakarta
harga berangkat umroh april di Jatinegara jakarta
paket umrah april di Pulo Gadung jakarta
biaya umroh mei di Dukuh jakarta
paket promo berangkat umrah februari di Makasar jakarta
harga paket berangkat umroh maret di Kramat Jati jakarta
biaya paket umrah mei bekasi timur
promo berangkat umrah ramadhan di Ceger jakarta